Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Suriname

Suriname: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 20 in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)
20
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
187th
of 191 countries
All-time high
20
in 2005
All-time low
20
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Suriname, 2005–2013

051015202005200920132005: 202006: 202007: 202008: 202009: 202010: 202011: 202012: 202013: 20

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Suriname recorded 20 for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Suriname peaked at 20 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 20, in 2005.

That places Suriname 187th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Suriname, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Suriname, 2005 to 2013.
Year Value Change
2005 20 —
2006 20 +0.0%
2007 20 +0.0%
2008 20 +0.0%
2009 20 +0.0%
2010 20 +0.0%
2011 20 +0.0%
2012 20 +0.0%
2013 20 +0.0%

Suriname compared with similar countries

  • Suriname's 20 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 53.33, 38% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Suriname's 20 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 53.33, 38% of the median. (33 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 20 20 20 5
2010s 20 20 20 4

Countries ranked near Suriname

  1. 188 Ethiopia 16.67 compare
  2. 188 Laos 16.67 compare
  3. 190 Afghanistan 10 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Suriname

All data for Suriname →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Suriname?
Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Suriname was 20 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Suriname?
The highest recorded value was 20 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Suriname?
The lowest recorded value was 20 in 2005.
How does Suriname rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Suriname ranks 187th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Suriname?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Suriname data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Suriname. Statizoid. Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/suriname/">Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Suriname</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.