Afghanistan vs Suriname: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Afghanistan
10
in 2013
Suriname
20
in 2013
Afghanistan rank
190th
Suriname rank
187th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 20 against 10 in Afghanistan, a difference of 10.
That makes Suriname's figure about 2.0 times Afghanistan's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 190th and Suriname ranks 187th of 191 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 | 20 | 10 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 10 | 20 | 10 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Afghanistan or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 20 against 10 in Afghanistan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Afghanistan and Suriname?
- 10, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Suriname?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Afghanistan and Suriname rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 190th and Suriname ranks 187th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.