Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Sudan

Sudan: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 30 in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)
30
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
168th
of 191 countries
All-time high
30
in 2005
All-time low
30
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Sudan, 2005–2013

01020302005200920132005: 302006: 302007: 302008: 302009: 302010: 302011: 302012: 302013: 30

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Sudan recorded 30 for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Sudan peaked at 30 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 30, in 2005.

That places Sudan 168th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Sudan, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Sudan, 2005 to 2013.
Year Value Change
2005 30 —
2006 30 +0.0%
2007 30 +0.0%
2008 30 +0.0%
2009 30 +0.0%
2010 30 +0.0%
2011 30 +0.0%
2012 30 +0.0%
2013 30 +0.0%

Sudan compared with similar countries

  • Sudan's 30 is below the median for low income countries, which is 35, 86% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Sudan's 30 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 38.33, 78% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 30 30 30 5
2010s 30 30 30 4

Countries ranked near Sudan

  1. 168 Algeria 30 compare
  2. 168 Costa Rica 30 compare
  3. 168 El Salvador 30 compare
  4. 168 Haiti 30 compare
  5. 168 Honduras 30 compare
  6. 168 Jordan 30 compare
  7. 168 Senegal 30 compare
  8. 168 Switzerland 30 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Sudan

All data for Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Sudan?
Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Sudan was 30 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 30 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 30 in 2005.
How does Sudan rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Sudan ranks 168th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Sudan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Sudan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Sudan. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/sudan/">Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Sudan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.