Costa Rica vs Sudan: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Costa Rica
30
in 2013
Sudan
30
in 2013
Costa Rica rank
168th
Sudan rank
168th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Sudan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 30 against 30 in Sudan, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 168th and Sudan ranks 168th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 30 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 30 | 30 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Costa Rica or Sudan?
- Costa Rica, at 30 against 30 in Sudan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Costa Rica and Sudan?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Costa Rica and Sudan rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 168th and Sudan ranks 168th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.