How does Kenya rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?

Kenya ranks 103rd out of 188 countries with data for 2013.

Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Kenya?

Over the last ten years it is up 7.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Kenya

Name: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Kenya
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Kenya: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 50 in 2013. ▲ Rising

Latest (2013)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

103rd

of 188 countries

All-time high

in 2007

All-time low

46.67

in 2005

Years of data

2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Kenya, 2005–2013

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Kenya recorded 50 for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is up 7.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Kenya peaked at 50 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 46.67, in 2005.

That places Kenya 103rd out of 188 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	48.67	46.67	50	5
2010s	50	50	50	4

Countries ranked near Kenya

103 China 50 compare
103 Argentina 50 compare
103 Bahrain 50 compare
103 Belarus 50 compare
103 Germany 50 compare
103 Lebanon 50 compare
103 Lesotho 50 compare
103 Oman 50 compare
103 Uruguay 50 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Kenya

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5379 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 12.22 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.1 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 67.66 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 58.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 68.95 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 18,270 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.55 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.377 (2050)

All data for Kenya →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Kenya?: Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Kenya was 50 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Kenya?: The highest recorded value was 50 in 2007.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Kenya?: The lowest recorded value was 46.67 in 2005.
How does Kenya rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?: Kenya ranks 103rd out of 188 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Kenya?: Over the last ten years it is up 7.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kenya data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.