Argentina vs Kenya: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Argentina
50
in 2013
Kenya
50
in 2013
Argentina rank
103rd
Kenya rank
103rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Argentina
- Kenya
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 50 against 50 in Kenya, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 103rd and Kenya ranks 103rd of 188 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 48.67 | 1.33 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Argentina or Kenya?
- Argentina, at 50 against 50 in Kenya as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Argentina and Kenya?
- 0, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kenya?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Argentina and Kenya rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Argentina ranks 103rd and Kenya ranks 103rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.