Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo
Democratic Republic of Congo: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 26.67 in 2013. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Democratic Republic of Congo is 26.67, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of up 14.3% on the previous year and up 14.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Democratic Republic of Congo peaked at 26.67 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 23.33, in 2005.
That places Democratic Republic of Congo 177th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 23.33 | — |
| 2006 | 23.33 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 23.33 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 23.33 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 23.33 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 23.33 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 23.33 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 23.33 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 26.67 | +14.3% |
Democratic Republic of Congo compared with similar countries
- Democratic Republic of Congo's 26.67 is below the median for low income countries, which is 35, 76% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Democratic Republic of Congo's 26.67 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 38.33, 70% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.33 | 23.33 | 23.33 | 5 |
| 2010s | 24.17 | 23.33 | 26.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo
More reference data data for Democratic Republic of Congo
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric 3,057 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop 235.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 1,764 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 601.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 140.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 313.43 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Democratic Republic of Congo was 26.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 26.67 in 2013.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 23.33 in 2005.
- How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 177th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.