Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Gambia: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Democratic Republic of the Congo
26.67
in 2013
Gambia
26.67
in 2013
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
176th
Gambia rank
176th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Gambia
How they compare
Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 26.67 against 26.67 in Gambia, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 176th and Gambia ranks 176th of 190 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.33 | 26.67 | 3.33 | Gambia |
| 2010s | 24.17 | 26.67 | 2.5 | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Gambia?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 26.67 against 26.67 in Gambia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Gambia?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Gambia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Gambia rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 176th and Gambia ranks 176th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.