Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Canada

Canada: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 86.67 in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)
86.67
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
5th
of 191 countries
All-time high
86.67
in 2012
All-time low
83.33
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Canada, 2005–2013

0204060802005200920132005: 83.32006: 83.32007: 83.32008: 83.32009: 83.32010: 83.32011: 83.32012: 86.72013: 86.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2013, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Canada stood at 86.67. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Canada peaked at 86.67 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 83.33, in 2005.

That places Canada 5th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Canada, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Canada, 2005 to 2013.
Year Value Change
2005 83.33 —
2006 83.33 +0.0%
2007 83.33 +0.0%
2008 83.33 +0.0%
2009 83.33 +0.0%
2010 83.33 +0.0%
2011 83.33 +0.0%
2012 86.67 +4.0%
2013 86.67 +0.0%

Canada compared with similar countries

  • Canada's 86.67 is above the median for high income countries, which is 56.67, 1.5× the median. (62 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 83.33 83.33 83.33 5
2010s 85 83.33 86.67 4

Countries ranked near Canada

  1. 2 Singapore 93.33 compare
  2. 3 Hong Kong 90 compare
  3. 3 Malaysia 90 compare
  4. 5 Ireland 86.67 compare
  5. 7 Mauritius 83.33 compare
  6. 8 United States 82 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Canada

All data for Canada →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Canada?
Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Canada was 86.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Canada?
The highest recorded value was 86.67 in 2012.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Canada?
The lowest recorded value was 83.33 in 2005.
How does Canada rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Canada ranks 5th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Canada?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Canada data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Canada. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/canada/">Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Canada</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.