Canada vs Malaysia: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Canada
86.67
in 2013
Malaysia
90
in 2013
Canada rank
5th
Malaysia rank
3rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Canada
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 90 against 86.67 in Canada, a difference of 3.33.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 5th and Malaysia ranks 3rd of 188 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 86.67 | 3.33 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 85 | 87.5 | 2.5 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Canada or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 90 against 86.67 in Canada as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Canada and Malaysia?
- 3.33, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Malaysia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Canada and Malaysia rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Canada ranks 5th and Malaysia ranks 3rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.