Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to in Belarus
Belarus: Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to was 12.2% in 2020. ▼ Falling
Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to in Belarus, 2002–2020
Source: Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO). Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for proportion of population facing financial hardship due to in Belarus is 12.2%, measured in 2020.
The figure is up 6.8% on the previous year and down 19.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, proportion of population facing financial hardship due to in Belarus peaked at 28.3% in 2002 and was at its lowest, 11.4%, in 2019.
Belarus ranks 58th of 80 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 19 years of available data.
Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to in Belarus, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 28.3% | — |
| 2003 | 26.1% | -7.7% |
| 2004 | 21.8% | -16.7% |
| 2005 | 21.2% | -2.7% |
| 2006 | 20.3% | -4.3% |
| 2007 | 17.2% | -15.1% |
| 2008 | 16.6% | -3.4% |
| 2009 | 17.0% | +2.2% |
| 2010 | 15.1% | -11.2% |
| 2011 | 13.8% | -8.6% |
| 2012 | 13.4% | -2.8% |
| 2013 | 13.4% | +0.1% |
| 2014 | 12.8% | -4.5% |
| 2015 | 13.3% | +4.0% |
| 2016 | 13.4% | +0.2% |
| 2017 | 13.2% | -1.4% |
| 2018 | 12.4% | -6.1% |
| 2019 | 11.4% | -7.8% |
| 2020 | 12.2% | +6.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.1% | 16.6% | 28.3% | 8 |
| 2010s | 13.2% | 11.4% | 15.1% | 10 |
| 2020s | 12.2% | 12.2% | 12.2% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is proportion of population facing financial hardship due to in Belarus?
- Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to in Belarus was 12.2% in 2020, according to Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO).
- What is the highest proportion of population facing financial hardship due to recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 28.3% in 2002.
- What is the lowest proportion of population facing financial hardship due to recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.4% in 2019.
- How does Belarus rank for proportion of population facing financial hardship due to?
- Belarus ranks 58th out of 80 countries with data for 2020.
- Is proportion of population facing financial hardship due to rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO), published as part of Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to out-of-pocket health expenditure (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Proportion of population spending more than 40% of household discretionary budget on out-of-pocket health expenditure (%) The discretionary budget is defined as the total household budget, measured by consumption expenditure or income, minus the societal poverty line (SPL ). Using 2017 purchasing power parities (PPPs), the SPL corresponds to whichever is greater: $2.15 (the international poverty line) or $1.15 + 50% of median household consumption expenditure or income, excluding out-of-pocket household expenditure on health. Out-of-pocket health expenditure is defined as any spending incurred by a household when any member uses a health good or service to receive any type of care (preventive, curative, rehabilitative, long-term or palliative care); provided by any type of provider; for any type of disease, illness or health condition; in any type of setting (outpatient, inpatient, at home).