Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to

Belarus
12.2%
in 2020
Sri Lanka
11.3%
in 2019
Belarus rank
58th
Sri Lanka rank
61st

Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to over time

  • Belarus
  • Sri Lanka
0102030199520072020

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 12.2% against 11.3% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.9%.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Belarus ranks 58th and Sri Lanka ranks 61st of 80 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2000s 19.5% 20.5% 1.0% Sri Lanka
2010s 12.7% 13.9% 1.2% Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of population facing financial hardship due to, Belarus or Sri Lanka?
Belarus, at 12.2% against 11.3% in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
What is the difference in proportion of population facing financial hardship due to between Belarus and Sri Lanka?
0.9%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sri Lanka?
6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Sri Lanka rank globally for proportion of population facing financial hardship due to?
Belarus ranks 58th and Sri Lanka ranks 61st of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to out-of-pocket health expenditure (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to. Statizoid, drawing on Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-facing-financial-hardship-due-to-out-of-pocket-health/belarus/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-population-facing-financial-hardship-due-to-out-of-pocket-health/belarus/sri-lanka/">Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to out-of-pocket health expenditure (%)
Unit
%
Source
Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
92 places, 1,175 data points, 1985–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of population spending more than 40% of household discretionary budget on out-of-pocket health expenditure (%) The discretionary budget is defined as the total household budget, measured by consumption expenditure or income, minus the societal poverty line (SPL ). Using 2017 purchasing power parities (PPPs), the SPL corresponds to whichever is greater: $2.15 (the international poverty line) or $1.15 + 50% of median household consumption expenditure or income, excluding out-of-pocket household expenditure on health. Out-of-pocket health expenditure is defined as any spending incurred by a household when any member uses a health good or service to receive any type of care (preventive, curative, rehabilitative, long-term or palliative care); provided by any type of provider; for any type of disease, illness or health condition; in any type of setting (outpatient, inpatient, at home).