Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tuvalu
Tuvalu: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Political Stability - Governance estimate in Tuvalu, 2003–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, political stability - governance estimate in Tuvalu stood at 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That represents a change of down 4.9% on the previous year and up 7.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political stability - governance estimate in Tuvalu peaked at 1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0.9352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2004.
Tuvalu ranks 8th of 208 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 23 years of available data.
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tuvalu, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 0.9653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 2004 | 0.9352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.1% |
| 2005 | 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +41.5% |
| 2006 | 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2007 | 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2008 | 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2009 | 1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.8% |
| 2010 | 1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2011 | 1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2012 | 1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2013 | 1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2015 | 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.9% |
| 2016 | 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2017 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.7% |
| 2018 | 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.2% |
| 2019 | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.6% |
| 2020 | 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.0% |
| 2021 | 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.3% |
| 2022 | 1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.7% |
| 2023 | 1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.9% |
Tuvalu compared with similar countries
- Tuvalu's 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 18.2× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Tuvalu's 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.849 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.7× the median. (36 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tuvalu changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | +41.5% | 0.9352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 7 |
| 2010s | 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tuvalu
- 5 Brunei 1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 6 Cayman Islands 1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 7 San Marino 1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 9 American Samoa 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 10 Bhutan 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 11 Samoa 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Tuvalu
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0016 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0016 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0016 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0039 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0095 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 1.45 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political stability - governance estimate in Tuvalu?
- Political stability - governance estimate in Tuvalu was 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Tuvalu?
- The highest recorded value was 1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009.
- What is the lowest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Tuvalu?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.9352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- How does Tuvalu rank for political stability - governance estimate?
- Tuvalu ranks 8th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political stability - governance estimate rising or falling in Tuvalu?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Tuvalu data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.