Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Bhutan
Bhutan: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Political Stability - Governance estimate in Bhutan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, political stability - governance estimate in Bhutan stood at 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. That is the highest value across all 27 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.0% on the previous year and up 42.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political stability - governance estimate in Bhutan peaked at 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025 and was at its lowest, 0.3295 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1998.
That places Bhutan 10th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Bhutan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.4672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.3295 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -29.5% |
| 2000 | 0.3938 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.5% |
| 2002 | 0.5362 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +36.2% |
| 2003 | 0.7718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +43.9% |
| 2004 | 0.8683 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.5% |
| 2005 | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +36.9% |
| 2006 | 0.9988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.0% |
| 2007 | 0.4639 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -53.6% |
| 2008 | 0.6446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +39.0% |
| 2009 | 0.8281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.5% |
| 2010 | 0.7571 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.6% |
| 2011 | 0.7544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2012 | 0.7833 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.8% |
| 2013 | 0.7697 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.7% |
| 2014 | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +48.9% |
| 2015 | 0.9777 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.7% |
| 2016 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.6% |
| 2017 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2018 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2019 | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.6% |
| 2020 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.4% |
| 2021 | 0.9158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.4% |
| 2022 | 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +45.0% |
| 2023 | 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.8% |
| 2024 | 1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.0% |
| 2025 | 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.0% |
Bhutan compared with similar countries
- Bhutan's 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.4762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (47 countries reporting)
- Bhutan's 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for South Asia, which is -0.243 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3983 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3295 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.7438 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3938 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.9621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
More reference data data for Bhutan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0217 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0671 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1192 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1192 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0727 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3489 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5881 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0909 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political stability - governance estimate in Bhutan?
- Political stability - governance estimate in Bhutan was 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- What is the lowest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3295 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- How does Bhutan rank for political stability - governance estimate?
- Bhutan ranks 10th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political stability - governance estimate rising or falling in Bhutan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 42.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.