Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tanzania
Tanzania: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.4762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Political Stability - Governance estimate in Tanzania, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, political stability - governance estimate in Tanzania stood at -0.4762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 28.9% on the previous year and down 0.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political stability - governance estimate in Tanzania peaked at 0.0095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009 and was at its lowest, -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2003.
That places Tanzania 151st out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tanzania, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.9635 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.8476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.0% |
| 2000 | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.8% |
| 2002 | -0.6072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -40.7% |
| 2003 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +69.5% |
| 2004 | -0.6621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -35.7% |
| 2005 | -0.5662 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.5% |
| 2006 | -0.3666 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -35.3% |
| 2007 | -0.3413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.9% |
| 2008 | -0.2449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -28.3% |
| 2009 | 0.0095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -103.9% |
| 2010 | -0.0854 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -999.8% |
| 2011 | -0.1902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +122.8% |
| 2012 | -0.1477 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.3% |
| 2013 | -0.426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +188.4% |
| 2014 | -0.4975 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.8% |
| 2015 | -0.476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.3% |
| 2016 | -0.5352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.5% |
| 2017 | -0.6737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +25.9% |
| 2018 | -0.6649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.3% |
| 2019 | -0.5623 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.4% |
| 2020 | -0.6745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.0% |
| 2021 | -0.5861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.1% |
| 2022 | -0.4896 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.5% |
| 2023 | -0.2537 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -48.2% |
| 2024 | -0.3695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +45.6% |
| 2025 | -0.4762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.9% |
Tanzania compared with similar countries
- Tanzania's -0.4762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.4762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Tanzania's -0.4762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.5276 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 90% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Tanzania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | -999.8% | 0.0095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0854 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.9055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9635 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.5369 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.4259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0854 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.4749 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2537 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania
More reference data data for Tanzania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6405 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 59.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 72.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political stability - governance estimate in Tanzania?
- Political stability - governance estimate in Tanzania was -0.4762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009.
- What is the lowest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
- How does Tanzania rank for political stability - governance estimate?
- Tanzania ranks 151st out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political stability - governance estimate rising or falling in Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.