Georgia vs Tanzania: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Georgia
-0.4951 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Tanzania
-0.4762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Georgia rank
154th
Tanzania rank
151st

Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Georgia
  • Tanzania
-2-1.5-1-0.50199620102025

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports -0.4762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4951 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Georgia, a difference of 0.0189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Tanzania ahead.

Georgia ranks 154th and Tanzania ranks 151st of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s -2.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tanzania
2000s -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5369 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4931 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tanzania
2010s -0.2386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1873 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Georgia
2020s -0.274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4749 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Georgia or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at -0.4762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4951 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Georgia as of 2025.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Georgia and Tanzania?
0.0189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Tanzania?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Tanzania rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Georgia ranks 154th and Tanzania ranks 151st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Tanzania: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/georgia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/georgia/tanzania/">Georgia vs Tanzania: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,485 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.