Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Czechia
Czechia: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Political Stability - Governance estimate in Czechia, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for political stability - governance estimate in Czechia is 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 6.4% on the previous year and down 6.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political stability - governance estimate in Czechia peaked at 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.6166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
That places Czechia 40th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Czechia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.9227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.4% |
| 2000 | 0.6166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -33.2% |
| 2002 | 0.9777 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +58.6% |
| 2003 | 0.882 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.8% |
| 2004 | 0.7081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.7% |
| 2005 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +45.3% |
| 2006 | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.3% |
| 2007 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.7% |
| 2008 | 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
| 2009 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.1% |
| 2010 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.4% |
| 2011 | 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.1% |
| 2012 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2013 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.4% |
| 2014 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7% |
| 2016 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.1% |
| 2017 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.7% |
| 2018 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.5% |
| 2019 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
| 2020 | 0.9053 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.8% |
| 2021 | 0.9944 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.8% |
| 2022 | 0.9943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.8% |
| 2024 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.7% |
| 2025 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.4% |
Czechia compared with similar countries
- Czechia's 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.8176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (76 countries reporting)
- Czechia's 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.4445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 2.3× the median. (54 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Czechia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | +58.6% | 0.6166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9777 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2005 | +45.3% | 0.7081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2000 | -33.2% | 0.9227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.9513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9053 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Czechia
More reference data data for Czechia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5039 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1071 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5681 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.81 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political stability - governance estimate in Czechia?
- Political stability - governance estimate in Czechia was 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Czechia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2011.
- What is the lowest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Czechia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.6166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Czechia rank for political stability - governance estimate?
- Czechia ranks 40th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political stability - governance estimate rising or falling in Czechia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Czechia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.