Czechia vs Macao: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Czechia
1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Macao
1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Czechia rank
40th
Macao rank
37th

Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Czechia
  • Macao
0.250.50.7511.2199620102025

How they compare

Macao currently reports 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Czechia, a difference of 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 40th and Macao ranks 37th of 208 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Macao Difference Ahead
1990s 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Czechia
2000s 0.9513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6587 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Czechia
2010s 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8863 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1904 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Czechia
2020s 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0015 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Czechia or Macao?
Macao, at 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Czechia as of 2025.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Czechia and Macao?
0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Macao?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Czechia and Macao rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Czechia ranks 40th and Macao ranks 37th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Macao: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/czechia/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/czechia/macao-sar-china/">Czechia vs Macao: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,485 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.