Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in China
China: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Political Stability - Governance estimate in China, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
China recorded 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for political stability - governance estimate in 2025. That is the highest value across all 27 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 133.6% on the previous year and up 104.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political stability - governance estimate in China peaked at 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025 and was at its lowest, -0.6377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2011.
That places China 115th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in China, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.1409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.3864 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +174.3% |
| 2000 | -0.2926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -24.3% |
| 2002 | -0.4735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +61.8% |
| 2003 | -0.5843 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +23.4% |
| 2004 | -0.4599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -21.3% |
| 2005 | -0.574 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +24.8% |
| 2006 | -0.5558 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.2% |
| 2007 | -0.5073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.7% |
| 2008 | -0.549 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.2% |
| 2009 | -0.3075 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -44.0% |
| 2010 | -0.6236 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +102.8% |
| 2011 | -0.6377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.3% |
| 2012 | -0.6265 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2013 | -0.569 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.2% |
| 2014 | -0.533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.3% |
| 2015 | -0.552 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.6% |
| 2016 | -0.516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.5% |
| 2017 | -0.2247 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -56.5% |
| 2018 | -0.2586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.1% |
| 2019 | -0.1573 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -39.2% |
| 2020 | -0.3106 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +97.4% |
| 2021 | -0.2747 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.6% |
| 2022 | -0.2544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.4% |
| 2023 | -0.189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -25.7% |
| 2024 | -0.0668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -64.6% |
| 2025 | 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -133.6% |
China compared with similar countries
- China's 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 29% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
- China's 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.849 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 3% of the median. (36 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in China changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | -174.3% | -0.1409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3864 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.2636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3864 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.4782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5843 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.4698 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1573 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.1788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3106 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near China
More reference data data for China
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 49.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 75.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 18.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 165.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 206.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 350.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1,480 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 102.37 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political stability - governance estimate in China?
- Political stability - governance estimate in China was 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest political stability - governance estimate recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- What is the lowest political stability - governance estimate recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.6377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2011.
- How does China rank for political stability - governance estimate?
- China ranks 115th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political stability - governance estimate rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 104.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.