China vs Maldives: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

China
0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Maldives
0.078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
China rank
115th
Maldives rank
113th

Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • China
  • Maldives
-0.500.51199620102025

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 0.078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in China, a difference of 0.0555 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Maldives's figure about 3.5 times China's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.

China ranks 115th and Maldives ranks 113th of 208 countries.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Maldives Difference Ahead
1990s -0.2636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Maldives
2000s -0.4782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Maldives
2010s -0.4698 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Maldives
2020s -0.1788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, China or Maldives?
Maldives, at 0.078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between China and Maldives?
0.0555 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Maldives?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do China and Maldives rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
China ranks 115th and Maldives ranks 113th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Maldives: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/china/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/china/maldives/">China vs Maldives: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,485 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.