Political regime ert in South Sudan
South Sudan: Political regime ert was 1 in 2025. ▬ Flat
Latest (2025)
1
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
23rd
of 175 countries
All-time high
1
in 2011
All-time low
1
in 2011
Years of data
15
2011–2025
Political regime ert in South Sudan, 2011–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for political regime ert in South Sudan is 1, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, political regime ert in South Sudan peaked at 1 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 1, in 2011.
That places South Sudan 23rd out of 175 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
Political regime ert in South Sudan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1 | — |
| 2012 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1 | +0.0% |
South Sudan compared with similar countries
- South Sudan's 1 is above the median for low income countries, which is 1, 1.0× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- South Sudan's 1 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1, 1.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Countries ranked near South Sudan
- 23 Albania 1 compare
- 23 Algeria 1 compare
- 23 Angola 1 compare
- 23 Australia 1 compare
- 23 Austria 1 compare
- 23 Azerbaijan 1 compare
- 23 Bahrain 1 compare
- 23 Bangladesh 1 compare
- 23 Barbados 1 compare
- 23 Belgium 1 compare
- 23 Bhutan 1 compare
- 23 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
- 23 Bulgaria 1 compare
- 23 Burundi 1 compare
- 23 Cameroon 1 compare
- 23 Canada 1 compare
- 23 Cape Verde 1 compare
- 23 Chad 1 compare
- 23 Chile 1 compare
- 23 China 1 compare
- 23 Colombia 1 compare
- 23 Comoros 1 compare
- 23 Congo 1 compare
- 23 Costa Rica 1 compare
- 23 Cuba 1 compare
- 23 Cyprus 1 compare
- 23 Czechia 1 compare
- 23 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 compare
- 23 Denmark 1 compare
- 23 Djibouti 1 compare
- 23 Ecuador 1 compare
- 23 Egypt 1 compare
- 23 Equatorial Guinea 1 compare
- 23 Eritrea 1 compare
- 23 Estonia 1 compare
- 23 Eswatini 1 compare
- 23 Ethiopia 1 compare
- 23 Finland 1 compare
- 23 France 1 compare
- 23 Gabon 1 compare
- 23 Germany 1 compare
- 23 Ghana 1 compare
- 23 Iceland 1 compare
- 23 Iran 1 compare
- 23 Iraq 1 compare
- 23 Ireland 1 compare
- 23 Israel 1 compare
- 23 Jamaica 1 compare
- 23 Japan 1 compare
- 23 Jordan 1 compare
- 23 Kazakhstan 1 compare
- 23 Kenya 1 compare
- 23 Laos 1 compare
- 23 Latvia 1 compare
- 23 Lebanon 1 compare
- 23 Liberia 1 compare
- 23 Lithuania 1 compare
- 23 Luxembourg 1 compare
- 23 Malawi 1 compare
- 23 Malaysia 1 compare
- 23 Malta 1 compare
- 23 Mongolia 1 compare
- 23 Morocco 1 compare
- 23 Namibia 1 compare
- 23 Netherlands 1 compare
- 23 New Zealand 1 compare
- 23 Nigeria 1 compare
- 23 North Korea 1 compare
- 23 North Macedonia 1 compare
- 23 Norway 1 compare
- 23 Oman 1 compare
- 23 Palestine 1
- 23 Panama 1 compare
- 23 Papua New Guinea 1 compare
- 23 Paraguay 1 compare
- 23 Portugal 1 compare
- 23 Qatar 1 compare
- 23 Russia 1 compare
- 23 Rwanda 1 compare
- 23 Sao Tome and Principe 1 compare
- 23 Saudi Arabia 1 compare
- 23 Sierra Leone 1 compare
- 23 Singapore 1 compare
- 23 Somalia 1 compare
- 23 South Africa 1 compare
- 23 South Korea 1 compare
- 23 Spain 1 compare
- 23 Sudan 1 compare
- 23 Suriname 1 compare
- 23 Sweden 1 compare
- 23 Switzerland 1 compare
- 23 Syria 1 compare
- 23 Taiwan 1 compare
- 23 Tajikistan 1 compare
- 23 Tanzania 1 compare
- 23 Trinidad and Tobago 1 compare
- 23 Turkey 1 compare
- 23 Turkmenistan 1 compare
- 23 Uganda 1 compare
- 23 United Arab Emirates 1 compare
- 23 Uruguay 1 compare
- 23 Uzbekistan 1 compare
- 23 Vanuatu 1 compare
- 23 Venezuela 1 compare
- 23 Vietnam 1 compare
- 23 Yemen 1 compare
- 23 Zimbabwe 1 compare
More reference data data for South Sudan
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 577.67 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3667 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 20.63 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 944.75 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 693.63 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.227 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0368 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 325.82 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 8,797 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political regime ert in South Sudan?
- Political regime ert in South Sudan was 1 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest political regime ert recorded in South Sudan?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 2011.
- What is the lowest political regime ert recorded in South Sudan?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 in 2011.
- How does South Sudan rank for political regime ert?
- South Sudan ranks 23rd out of 175 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political regime ert rising or falling in South Sudan?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this South Sudan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Political regime ert. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).