Political Polarization Score in Jordan
Jordan: Political Polarization Score was -0.998 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Political Polarization Score in Jordan, 1922–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Jordan recorded -0.998 for political polarization score in 2025.
The figure is down 114.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political polarization score in Jordan peaked at 1.76 in 1970 and was at its lowest, -1.82, in 1990.
That places Jordan 133rd out of 174 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 104 years of available data.
Political Polarization Score in Jordan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1922 | -1.55 | — |
| 1923 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.14 | -26.0% |
| 1948 | -1.14 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.14 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.32 | +15.6% |
| 1951 | -1.32 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.32 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.32 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -1.1 | -16.9% |
| 1955 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.941 | -14.4% |
| 1957 | 0.422 | -144.8% |
| 1958 | -1.13 | -366.8% |
| 1959 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.13 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.31 | +16.4% |
| 1966 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | 1.76 | -234.2% |
| 1971 | -0.972 | -155.2% |
| 1972 | -1.55 | +59.6% |
| 1973 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.75 | +12.9% |
| 1981 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -1.82 | +4.2% |
| 1991 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -1.42 | -22.0% |
| 2001 | -1.42 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -1.64 | +15.2% |
| 2003 | -1.41 | -13.7% |
| 2004 | -1.44 | +1.7% |
| 2005 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -1.26 | -12.2% |
| 2011 | -0.863 | -31.6% |
| 2012 | -0.661 | -23.4% |
| 2013 | -0.466 | -29.5% |
| 2014 | -0.466 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.466 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -0.466 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -0.466 | -0.0% |
| 2018 | -0.932 | +100.0% |
| 2019 | -0.932 | -0.0% |
| 2020 | -0.628 | -32.6% |
| 2021 | -0.628 | -0.0% |
| 2022 | -1.07 | +70.9% |
| 2023 | -1.07 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -0.998 | -7.0% |
| 2025 | -0.998 | -0.0% |
Jordan compared with similar countries
- Jordan's -0.998 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.6285. (48 countries reporting)
- Jordan's -0.998 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.418. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | -1.55 | -1.55 | -1.55 | 8 |
| 1930s | -1.55 | -1.55 | -1.55 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.43 | -1.55 | -1.14 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.03 | -1.32 | 0.422 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.22 | -1.31 | -1.13 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.16 | -1.55 | 1.76 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.75 | -1.75 | -1.75 | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.82 | -1.82 | -1.82 | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.45 | -1.64 | -1.41 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.698 | -1.26 | -0.466 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.8997 | -1.07 | -0.628 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Jordan
More reference data data for Jordan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0464 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.425 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.7273 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.7273 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1557 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0557 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0299 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political polarization score in Jordan?
- Political polarization score in Jordan was -0.998 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest political polarization score recorded in Jordan?
- The highest recorded value was 1.76 in 1970.
- What is the lowest political polarization score recorded in Jordan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.82 in 1990.
- How does Jordan rank for political polarization score?
- Jordan ranks 133rd out of 174 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political polarization score rising or falling in Jordan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 114.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Jordan data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Political Polarization Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 104 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which society is divided into hostile political camps, where political differences undermine social relationships and discourage interaction across ideological lines.