Centralization of Political Power Index in Tunisia
Tunisia: Centralization of Political Power Index was 0.442 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Centralization of Political Power Index in Tunisia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Tunisia recorded 0.442 for centralization of political power index in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 20.1% on the previous year and up 474.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, centralization of political power index in Tunisia peaked at 0.927 in 1789 and was at its lowest, 0.07, in 2018.
Tunisia ranks 77th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Centralization of Political Power Index in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.927 | — |
| 1790 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.927 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.891 | -3.9% |
| 1858 | 0.891 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.873 | -2.0% |
| 1860 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.873 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.925 | +6.0% |
| 1866 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.85 | -8.1% |
| 1901 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.85 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.713 | -16.1% |
| 1957 | 0.741 | +3.9% |
| 1958 | 0.668 | -9.9% |
| 1959 | 0.643 | -3.7% |
| 1960 | 0.545 | -15.2% |
| 1961 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.545 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.874 | +60.4% |
| 1989 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.874 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.876 | +0.2% |
| 2007 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.807 | -7.9% |
| 2011 | 0.135 | -83.3% |
| 2012 | 0.117 | -13.3% |
| 2013 | 0.107 | -8.5% |
| 2014 | 0.096 | -10.3% |
| 2015 | 0.077 | -19.8% |
| 2016 | 0.083 | +7.8% |
| 2017 | 0.075 | -9.6% |
| 2018 | 0.07 | -6.7% |
| 2019 | 0.07 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.076 | +8.6% |
| 2021 | 0.149 | +96.1% |
| 2022 | 0.398 | +167.1% |
| 2023 | 0.663 | +66.6% |
| 2024 | 0.553 | -16.6% |
| 2025 | 0.442 | -20.1% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 0.442 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.5475, 81% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's 0.442 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.597, 74% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.927 | 0.927 | 0.927 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.927 | 0.927 | 0.927 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.927 | 0.927 | 0.927 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.927 | 0.927 | 0.927 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.927 | 0.927 | 0.927 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.927 | 0.927 | 0.927 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.927 | 0.927 | 0.927 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.9144 | 0.873 | 0.927 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.899 | 0.873 | 0.925 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.925 | 0.925 | 0.925 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.925 | 0.925 | 0.925 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.925 | 0.925 | 0.925 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.7865 | 0.643 | 0.85 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.545 | 0.545 | 0.545 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.545 | 0.545 | 0.545 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6108 | 0.545 | 0.874 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.874 | 0.874 | 0.874 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.8748 | 0.874 | 0.876 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1637 | 0.07 | 0.807 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.3802 | 0.076 | 0.663 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
More reference data data for Tunisia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.148 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1317 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is centralization of political power index in Tunisia?
- Centralization of political power index in Tunisia was 0.442 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest centralization of political power index recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.927 in 1789.
- What is the lowest centralization of political power index recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.07 in 2018.
- How does Tunisia rank for centralization of political power index?
- Tunisia ranks 77th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is centralization of political power index rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 474.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Centralization of Political Power Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the executive is unconstrained by the legislature, judiciary, electoral management body, and other oversight.