Centralization of Political Power Index in Guatemala
Guatemala: Centralization of Political Power Index was 0.059 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Centralization of Political Power Index in Guatemala, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for centralization of political power index in Guatemala is 0.059, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 11.3% on the previous year and down 71.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, centralization of political power index in Guatemala peaked at 0.797 in 1844 and was at its lowest, 0.053, in 2024.
That places Guatemala 154th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 236 years of available data.
Centralization of Political Power Index in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.428 | — |
| 1790 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.428 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.682 | +59.3% |
| 1824 | 0.596 | -12.6% |
| 1825 | 0.472 | -20.8% |
| 1826 | 0.472 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.472 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.472 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.472 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.472 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.472 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.472 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.472 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.472 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.655 | +38.8% |
| 1836 | 0.655 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.655 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.745 | +13.7% |
| 1839 | 0.745 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.745 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.745 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.745 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.745 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.797 | +7.0% |
| 1845 | 0.797 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.797 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.661 | -17.1% |
| 1848 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.661 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.609 | -7.9% |
| 1867 | 0.609 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.609 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.559 | -8.2% |
| 1870 | 0.569 | +1.8% |
| 1871 | 0.626 | +10.0% |
| 1872 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.626 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.577 | -7.8% |
| 1887 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.577 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.769 | +33.3% |
| 1900 | 0.769 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.769 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.769 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.769 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.769 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.769 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.769 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.769 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.769 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.769 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.764 | -0.7% |
| 1911 | 0.764 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.764 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.764 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.764 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.764 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.764 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.764 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.764 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.748 | -2.1% |
| 1920 | 0.683 | -8.7% |
| 1921 | 0.649 | -5.0% |
| 1922 | 0.659 | +1.5% |
| 1923 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.74 | +12.3% |
| 1932 | 0.74 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.74 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.74 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.74 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.74 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.74 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.74 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.74 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.74 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.74 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.74 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.74 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.667 | -9.9% |
| 1945 | 0.433 | -35.1% |
| 1946 | 0.433 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.433 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.433 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.433 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.439 | +1.4% |
| 1951 | 0.439 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.439 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.509 | +15.9% |
| 1954 | 0.601 | +18.1% |
| 1955 | 0.718 | +19.5% |
| 1956 | 0.601 | -16.3% |
| 1957 | 0.593 | -1.3% |
| 1958 | 0.592 | -0.2% |
| 1959 | 0.592 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.592 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.592 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.607 | +2.5% |
| 1963 | 0.676 | +11.4% |
| 1964 | 0.7 | +3.6% |
| 1965 | 0.7 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.603 | -13.9% |
| 1967 | 0.556 | -7.8% |
| 1968 | 0.556 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.556 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.599 | +7.7% |
| 1971 | 0.598 | -0.2% |
| 1972 | 0.598 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.598 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.598 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.592 | -1.0% |
| 1976 | 0.592 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.592 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.676 | +14.2% |
| 1979 | 0.676 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.676 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.676 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.727 | +7.5% |
| 1983 | 0.71 | -2.3% |
| 1984 | 0.688 | -3.1% |
| 1985 | 0.597 | -13.2% |
| 1986 | 0.498 | -16.6% |
| 1987 | 0.382 | -23.3% |
| 1988 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.383 | +0.3% |
| 1994 | 0.362 | -5.5% |
| 1995 | 0.325 | -10.2% |
| 1996 | 0.331 | +1.8% |
| 1997 | 0.358 | +8.2% |
| 1998 | 0.358 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.348 | -2.8% |
| 2000 | 0.316 | -9.2% |
| 2001 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.313 | -0.9% |
| 2005 | 0.306 | -2.2% |
| 2006 | 0.306 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.31 | +1.3% |
| 2008 | 0.315 | +1.6% |
| 2009 | 0.315 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.303 | -3.8% |
| 2011 | 0.298 | -1.7% |
| 2012 | 0.304 | +2.0% |
| 2013 | 0.247 | -18.8% |
| 2014 | 0.213 | -13.8% |
| 2015 | 0.209 | -1.9% |
| 2016 | 0.22 | +5.3% |
| 2017 | 0.207 | -5.9% |
| 2018 | 0.239 | +15.5% |
| 2019 | 0.26 | +8.8% |
| 2020 | 0.292 | +12.3% |
| 2021 | 0.354 | +21.2% |
| 2022 | 0.386 | +9.0% |
| 2023 | 0.278 | -28.0% |
| 2024 | 0.053 | -80.9% |
| 2025 | 0.059 | +11.3% |
Guatemala compared with similar countries
- Guatemala's 0.059 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.3495, 17% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Guatemala's 0.059 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.236, 25% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.428 | 0.428 | 0.428 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.428 | 0.428 | 0.428 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.428 | 0.428 | 0.428 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.428 | 0.428 | 0.428 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.4993 | 0.428 | 0.682 | 9 |
| 1830s | 0.5815 | 0.472 | 0.745 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.7354 | 0.661 | 0.797 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.661 | 0.661 | 0.661 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.6352 | 0.559 | 0.661 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.6203 | 0.569 | 0.626 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.6064 | 0.577 | 0.626 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.5962 | 0.577 | 0.769 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.769 | 0.769 | 0.769 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.7624 | 0.748 | 0.764 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.6604 | 0.649 | 0.683 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.7319 | 0.659 | 0.74 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.5792 | 0.433 | 0.74 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.5523 | 0.439 | 0.718 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.6138 | 0.556 | 0.7 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.6119 | 0.592 | 0.676 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.5718 | 0.382 | 0.727 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.3611 | 0.325 | 0.383 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3129 | 0.306 | 0.316 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.25 | 0.207 | 0.304 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.237 | 0.053 | 0.386 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
More reference data data for Guatemala
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1246 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6786 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is centralization of political power index in Guatemala?
- Centralization of political power index in Guatemala was 0.059 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest centralization of political power index recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 0.797 in 1844.
- What is the lowest centralization of political power index recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.053 in 2024.
- How does Guatemala rank for centralization of political power index?
- Guatemala ranks 154th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is centralization of political power index rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is down 71.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Centralization of Political Power Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 236 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the executive is unconstrained by the legislature, judiciary, electoral management body, and other oversight.