PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 in Canada
Canada: PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 was 11.0% in 2018. ▲ Rising
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 in Canada, 2000–2018
Source: OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
Analysis
In 2018, pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Canada stood at 11.0%.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.0% on the previous year and down 8.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Canada peaked at 12.0% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 10.0%, in 2000.
That places Canada 40th out of 55 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.5% | 10.0% | 12.0% | 4 |
| 2010s | 10.7% | 10.0% | 11.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Canada
- 40 Australia 11.0% compare
- 40 Brazil 11.0% compare
- 40 Japan 11.0% compare
- 40 South Korea 11.0% compare
- 40 Macao 11.0% compare
- 40 New Zealand 11.0% compare
- 40 Sweden 11.0% compare
- 40 United Kingdom 11.0% compare
- 40 United States 11.0% compare
More reference data data for Canada
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 14.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 5,838 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 4,209 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 24,381 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 99.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 240.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 1,255 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 1,000 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 5,838 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 406.4 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Canada?
- Pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Canada was 11.0% in 2018, according to OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
- What is the highest pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 recorded in Canada?
- The highest recorded value was 12.0% in 2009.
- What is the lowest pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 recorded in Canada?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.0% in 2000.
- How does Canada rank for pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2?
- Canada ranks 40th out of 55 countries with data for 2018.
- Is pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 rising or falling in Canada?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Canada data come from?
- The figures come from OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as part of PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 407 but lower than or equal to 480 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 2 can identify the main idea in a piece of text of moderate length. They can understand relationships or construe meaning within a limited part of the text when the information is not prominent by producing basic inferences, and/or when the text(s) include some distracting information. They can select and access a page in a set based on explicit though sometimes complex prompts, and locate one or more pieces of information based on multiple, partly implicit criteria. Readers at Level 2 can, when explicitly cued, reflect on the overall purpose, or on the purpose of specific details, in texts of moderate length. They can reflect on simple visual or typographical features. They can compare claims and evaluate the reasons supporting them based on short, explicit statements. Tasks at Level 2 may involve comparisons or contrasts based on a single feature in the text. Typical reflective tasks at this level require readers to make a comparison or several connections between the text and outside knowledge by drawing on personal experience and attitudes. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5) than later assessments. PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 2 data have been included in this database as Level 2 because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/