PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 4 in Mexico
Mexico: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 4 was 3.0% in 2018. ▼ Falling
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 4 in Mexico, 2000–2018
Source: OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
Analysis
Mexico recorded 3.0% for pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 4 in 2018. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
That represents a change of up 50.0% on the previous year and unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 4 in Mexico peaked at 3.0% in 2000 and was at its lowest, 2.0%, in 2015.
That places Mexico 46th out of 55 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% | 4 |
| 2010s | 2.7% | 2.0% | 3.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
More reference data data for Mexico
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 16.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 32.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 32.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 7.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 84.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 157.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.55 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 4 in Mexico?
- Pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 4 in Mexico was 3.0% in 2018, according to OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
- What is the highest pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 4 recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 3.0% in 2000.
- What is the lowest pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 4 recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.0% in 2015.
- How does Mexico rank for pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 4?
- Mexico ranks 46th out of 55 countries with data for 2018.
- Is pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 4 rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as part of PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 4. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 553 but lower than or equal to 626 on the PISA reading scale. At Level 4, readers can comprehend extended passages in single or multiple-text settings. They interpret the meaning of nuances of language in a section of text by taking into account the text as a whole. In other interpretative tasks, students demonstrate understanding and application of ad hoc categories. They can compare perspectives and draw inferences based on multiple sources. Readers can search, locate and integrate several pieces of embedded information in the presence of plausible distractors. They can generate inferences based on the task statement in order to assess the relevance of target information. They can handle tasks that require them to memories prior task context. In addition, students at this level can evaluate the relationship between specific statements and a person’s overall stance or conclusion about a topic. They can reflect on the strategies that authors use to convey their points, based on salient features of texts (e.g., titles and illustrations). They can compare and contrast claims explicitly made in several texts and assess the reliability of a source based on salient criteria. Texts at Level 4 are often long or complex, and their content or form may not be standard. Many of the tasks are situated in multiple-text settings. The texts and the tasks contain indirect or implicit cues. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5). PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 4 data have been included in this database as Level 4 because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/