PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 in Mexico
Mexico: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 was 17.0% in 2018. ▲ Rising
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 in Mexico, 2000–2018
Source: OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
Analysis
Mexico recorded 17.0% for pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in 2018.
The figure is down 5.6% on the previous year and unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Mexico peaked at 19.0% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 15.0%, in 2003.
That places Mexico 3rd out of 55 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top 10%.
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 in Mexico, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 16.0% | — |
| 2003 | 15.0% | -6.2% |
| 2006 | 16.0% | +6.7% |
| 2009 | 17.0% | +6.2% |
| 2012 | 19.0% | +11.8% |
| 2015 | 18.0% | -5.3% |
| 2018 | 17.0% | -5.6% |
Mexico compared with similar countries
- Mexico's 17.0% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 15.0%, 1.1× the median. (11 countries reporting)
- Mexico's 17.0% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 15.0%, 1.1× the median. (7 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.0% | 15.0% | 17.0% | 4 |
| 2010s | 18.0% | 17.0% | 19.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
More reference data data for Mexico
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 16.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 32.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 32.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 7.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 84.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 157.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.55 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Mexico?
- Pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Mexico was 17.0% in 2018, according to OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
- What is the highest pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 19.0% in 2012.
- What is the lowest pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 15.0% in 2003.
- How does Mexico rank for pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2?
- Mexico ranks 3rd out of 55 countries with data for 2018.
- Is pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as part of PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 407 but lower than or equal to 480 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 2 can identify the main idea in a piece of text of moderate length. They can understand relationships or construe meaning within a limited part of the text when the information is not prominent by producing basic inferences, and/or when the text(s) include some distracting information. They can select and access a page in a set based on explicit though sometimes complex prompts, and locate one or more pieces of information based on multiple, partly implicit criteria. Readers at Level 2 can, when explicitly cued, reflect on the overall purpose, or on the purpose of specific details, in texts of moderate length. They can reflect on simple visual or typographical features. They can compare claims and evaluate the reasons supporting them based on short, explicit statements. Tasks at Level 2 may involve comparisons or contrasts based on a single feature in the text. Typical reflective tasks at this level require readers to make a comparison or several connections between the text and outside knowledge by drawing on personal experience and attitudes. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5) than later assessments. PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 2 data have been included in this database as Level 2 because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/