PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Level 1 in Brazil
Brazil: PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Level 1 was 41.0% in 2018. ▼ Falling
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Level 1 in Brazil, 2003–2018
Source: OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
Analysis
The most recent figure for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below level 1 in Brazil is 41.0%, measured in 2018.
The figure is down 6.2% on the previous year and up 7.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below level 1 in Brazil peaked at 53.3% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 35.2%, in 2012.
Brazil ranks 2nd of 53 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Level 1 in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 53.3% | — |
| 2006 | 46.6% | -12.6% |
| 2009 | 38.1% | -18.1% |
| 2012 | 35.2% | -7.6% |
| 2015 | 43.7% | +24.2% |
| 2018 | 41.0% | -6.2% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 41.0% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 28.4%, 1.4× the median. (10 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 41.0% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 30.7%, 1.3× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.0% | 38.1% | 53.3% | 3 |
| 2010s | 40.0% | 35.2% | 43.7% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More reference data data for Brazil
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below level 1 in Brazil?
- Pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below level 1 in Brazil was 41.0% in 2018, according to OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
- What is the highest pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below level 1 recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 53.3% in 2003.
- What is the lowest pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below level 1 recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 35.2% in 2012.
- How does Brazil rank for pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below level 1?
- Brazil ranks 2nd out of 53 countries with data for 2018.
- Is pisa: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). below level 1 rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as part of PISA: 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Below Level 1. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old students below the lowest proficiency level (scoring 358 or below) on the PISA mathematics scale. Students below Level 1 may be able to perform very direct and straightforward mathematical tasks, such as reading a single value from a well-labeled chart or table where the labels on the chart match the words in the stimulus and question, so that the selection criteria are clear and the relationship between the chart and the aspects of the context depicted are evident, and performing arithmetic calculations with whole numbers by following clear and well-defined instructions. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/