Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score in Chinese Taipei
Chinese Taipei: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score was 84.9% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score in Chinese Taipei, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Chinese Taipei recorded 84.9% for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score in 2019.
That represents a change of down 3.6% on the previous year and up 8.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score in Chinese Taipei peaked at 88.6% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 77.8%, in 2007.
That places Chinese Taipei 93rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score in Chinese Taipei, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 88.5% | — |
| 2006 | 83.7% | -5.5% |
| 2007 | 77.8% | -7.0% |
| 2008 | 78.1% | +0.3% |
| 2009 | 78.1% | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 78.4% | +0.5% |
| 2011 | 86.8% | +10.7% |
| 2012 | 88.0% | +1.3% |
| 2013 | 88.6% | +0.7% |
| 2014 | 88.6% | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 88.3% | -0.4% |
| 2016 | 88.2% | -0.0% |
| 2017 | 88.6% | +0.4% |
| 2018 | 88.1% | -0.5% |
| 2019 | 84.9% | -3.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.2% | 77.8% | 88.5% | 5 |
| 2010s | 86.9% | 78.4% | 88.6% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Chinese Taipei
- 90 Albania 85.2% compare
- 91 United States of America 85.2% compare
- 92 Finland 85.1% compare
- 94 Peru 84.8% compare
- 95 Sao Tome and Principe 84.6% compare
- 96 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 84.6% compare
More reference data data for Chinese Taipei
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 360.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.6 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 111.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 46.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 2,323 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 400.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 306.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 2,013 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2515 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score in Chinese Taipei?
- Paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score in Chinese Taipei was 84.9% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score recorded in Chinese Taipei?
- The highest recorded value was 88.6% in 2014.
- What is the lowest paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score recorded in Chinese Taipei?
- The lowest recorded value was 77.8% in 2007.
- How does Chinese Taipei rank for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Chinese Taipei ranks 93rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score rising or falling in Chinese Taipei?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chinese Taipei data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.