Finland vs Chinese Taipei: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Finland
85.1%
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
84.9%
in 2019
Finland rank
92nd
Chinese Taipei rank
93rd
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Finland
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Finland currently reports 85.1% against 84.9% in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.
Finland ranks 92nd and Chinese Taipei ranks 93rd of 191 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.2% | 81.2% | 13.0% | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 81.9% | 86.9% | 5.0% | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Finland or Chinese Taipei?
- Finland, at 85.1% against 84.9% in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Finland and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.2%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Chinese Taipei?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Chinese Taipei rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Finland ranks 92nd and Chinese Taipei ranks 93rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.