Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score in Nicaragua
Nicaragua: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score was 48.4% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score in Nicaragua, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Nicaragua recorded 48.4% for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score in Nicaragua peaked at 50.6% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 42.6%, in 2011.
That places Nicaragua 170th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score in Nicaragua, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 43.5% | — |
| 2006 | 43.5% | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 43.5% | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 44.0% | +1.0% |
| 2009 | 44.0% | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 44.0% | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 42.6% | -3.1% |
| 2012 | 45.4% | +6.5% |
| 2013 | 45.4% | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 50.6% | +11.6% |
| 2015 | 49.4% | -2.6% |
| 2016 | 49.7% | +0.7% |
| 2017 | 49.0% | -1.3% |
| 2018 | 48.4% | -1.3% |
| 2019 | 48.4% | +0.0% |
Nicaragua compared with similar countries
- Nicaragua's 48.4% is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 83.3%, 58% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Nicaragua's 48.4% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 81.7%, 59% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.7% | 43.5% | 44.0% | 5 |
| 2010s | 47.3% | 42.6% | 50.6% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Nicaragua
More reference data data for Nicaragua
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4575 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0819 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4557 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4457 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score in Nicaragua?
- Paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score in Nicaragua was 48.4% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score recorded in Nicaragua?
- The highest recorded value was 50.6% in 2014.
- What is the lowest paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score recorded in Nicaragua?
- The lowest recorded value was 42.6% in 2011.
- How does Nicaragua rank for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Nicaragua ranks 170th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score rising or falling in Nicaragua?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Nicaragua data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.