Chad vs Nicaragua: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score
Chad
43.6%
in 2019
Nicaragua
48.4%
in 2019
Chad rank
173rd
Nicaragua rank
170th
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score over time
- Chad
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 48.4% against 43.6% in Chad, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 173rd and Nicaragua ranks 170th of 191 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.6% | 43.7% | 17.1% | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 35.2% | 47.3% | 12.1% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score, Chad or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 48.4% against 43.6% in Chad as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score between Chad and Nicaragua?
- 4.8%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Nicaragua?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Chad and Nicaragua rank globally for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Chad ranks 173rd and Nicaragua ranks 170th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.