Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) was 0 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) in Ecuador, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 0 for paying taxes: time to obtain vat refund (weeks) (db17-20 methodology) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That places Ecuador 96th out of 154 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 93 Antigua and Barbuda 4.37 compare
- 94 Jordan 4.04 compare
- 95 Honduras 1.06 compare
- 96 China 0 compare
- 96 India 0 compare
- 96 Nigeria 0 compare
- 96 Pakistan 0 compare
- 96 Brazil 0 compare
- 96 Algeria 0 compare
- 96 Argentina 0 compare
- 96 Barbados 0 compare
- 96 Belarus 0 compare
- 96 Benin 0 compare
- 96 Bolivia 0 compare
- 96 Burkina Faso 0 compare
- 96 Burundi 0 compare
- 96 Cambodia 0 compare
- 96 Cameroon 0 compare
- 96 Chad 0 compare
- 96 Colombia 0 compare
- 96 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 compare
- 96 Congo 0 compare
- 96 Dominican Republic 0 compare
- 96 El Salvador 0 compare
- 96 Gambia 0 compare
- 96 Ghana 0 compare
- 96 Grenada 0 compare
- 96 Guatemala 0 compare
- 96 Guinea 0 compare
- 96 Guinea-Bissau 0 compare
- 96 Haiti 0 compare
- 96 Italy 0 compare
- 96 Jamaica 0 compare
- 96 Kazakhstan 0 compare
- 96 Kyrgyzstan 0 compare
- 96 Laos 0 compare
- 96 Madagascar 0 compare
- 96 Maldives 0 compare
- 96 Mali 0 compare
- 96 Mauritania 0 compare
- 96 Mongolia 0 compare
- 96 Myanmar 0 compare
- 96 Niger 0 compare
- 96 Panama 0 compare
- 96 Paraguay 0 compare
- 96 Peru 0 compare
- 96 Philippines 0 compare
- 96 Somalia 0 compare
- 96 Sri Lanka 0 compare
- 96 Sudan 0 compare
- 96 Suriname 0 compare
- 96 Tajikistan 0 compare
- 96 Tanzania 0 compare
- 96 Togo 0 compare
- 96 Tunisia 0 compare
- 96 Uruguay 0 compare
- 96 Uzbekistan 0 compare
- 96 Venezuela 0 compare
- 96 Vietnam 0 compare
- 96 Palestine 0 compare
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is paying taxes: time to obtain vat refund (weeks) (db17-20 methodology) in Ecuador?
- Paying taxes: time to obtain vat refund (weeks) (db17-20 methodology) in Ecuador was 0 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest paying taxes: time to obtain vat refund (weeks) (db17-20 methodology) recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0 in 2015.
- What is the lowest paying taxes: time to obtain vat refund (weeks) (db17-20 methodology) recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2015.
- How does Ecuador rank for paying taxes: time to obtain vat refund (weeks) (db17-20 methodology)?
- Ecuador ranks 96th out of 154 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for time to obtain VAT refund benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.