Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score by country

The score for time to obtain VAT refund benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the...

Countries reporting
155
Highest
100
Austria
Lowest
0
Vietnam
Median
31.85
Years covered
5
2015–2019
Data points
780

What the numbers show

Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score is currently reported for 155 countries. The highest value is 100 in Austria; the lowest is 0 in Vietnam.

The median across all reporting countries is 31.85, and the mean is 37.29.

Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology): full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Austria 100 2019 β€” flat
1 Estonia 100 2019 β€” flat
1 Djibouti 0 2019 β€” flat
3 Mauritius 97.86 2019 β€” rising
4 Germany 96.2 2019 β€” flat
4 New Zealand 96.2 2019 β€” flat
4 Slovenia 96.2 2019 β€” flat
7 Finland 94.27 2019 β€” flat
7 France 94.27 2019 β€” flat
7 Croatia 94.27 2019 β€” flat
7 Lithuania 94.27 2019 β€” flat
7 Latvia 94.27 2019 β€” flat
7 Yemen 94.27 2019 β€” flat
13 United Kingdom 92.25 2019 β€” flat
14 Israel 91.79 2019 β€” rising
15 Australia 90.83 2019 β€” flat
16 Poland 90.41 2019 β€” flat
16 Sweden 90.41 2019 β€” flat
18 South Korea 89.49 2019 β€” flat
19 Denmark 86.69 2019 β€” flat
20 Georgia 86.55 2019 β€” flat
21 Serbia 86.41 2019 β€” rising
22 Japan 85.36 2019 β€” flat
23 Hungary 84.62 2019 β€” rising
24 Taiwan 84.02 2019 β€” flat
25 Cote d'Ivoire 81.31 2019 β€” volatile
26 Moldova 80.48 2019 β€” flat
27 Canada 79.1 2019 β€” flat
28 Samoa 79.06 2019 β€” flat
29 Norway 78.92 2019 β€” flat
30 Portugal 78.83 2019 β€” flat
31 Ukraine 78.55 2019 β€” flat
32 Switzerland 78.19 2019 β€” flat
32 Netherlands 78.19 2019 β€” flat
34 Luxembourg 76.9 2019 β€” flat
35 Uganda 76.35 2019 β€” flat
36 South Africa 76.26 2019 β€” flat
37 Ireland 74.65 2019 β€” flat
38 Spain 74.42 2019 β€” flat
39 Seychelles 73.68 2019 β€” flat
40 Senegal 73.59 2019 β€” rising
41 Namibia 73.27 2019 β€” flat
42 Czechia 71.93 2019 β€” flat
43 Bangladesh 71.6 2019 β€” flat
44 Belize 70.56 2019 β€” flat
45 Fiji 69.73 2019 β€” flat
46 Bosnia and Herzegovina 69.45 2019 β€” flat
47 Eswatini 69.18 2019 β€” flat
48 Russia 68.81 2019 β€” rising
49 Zambia 66.97 2019 β€” flat
50 Singapore 65.5 2019 β€” flat
51 Montenegro 64.01 2019 β€” flat
52 Costa Rica 61.45 2019 β€” flat
53 Slovakia 59.58 2019 β€” flat
54 Iceland 58.93 2019 β€” flat
55 Bulgaria 58.24 2019 β€” flat
56 Saint Lucia 56.77 2019 β€” flat
57 Botswana 55.39 2019 β€” flat
58 Romania 53.18 2019 β€” flat
59 Azerbaijan 52.9 2019 β€” flat
60 Malta 52.26 2019 β€” flat
61 Vanuatu 52.08 2019 β€” flat
62 Belgium 51.16 2019 β€” flat
63 Armenia 50.88 2019 β€” volatile
64 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 47.11 2019 β€” flat
65 Greece 45.46 2019 β€” flat
66 Dominica 44.63 2019 β€” flat
67 Tonga 42.52 2019 β€” flat
68 Thailand 42.15 2019 β€” flat
69 Guyana 40.77 2019 β€” flat
70 Egypt 39.67 2019 β€” volatile
71 Kiribati 39.3 2019 β€” flat
72 Cape Verde 38.29 2019 β€” flat
73 Mozambique 35.3 2019 β€” volatile
74 North Macedonia 35.25 2019 β€” flat
75 Albania 34.7 2019 β€” flat
76 Nepal 34.15 2019 β€” flat
77 Chile 33.32 2019 β€” flat
78 Iran 31.85 2019 β€” flat
79 Papua New Guinea 30.57 2019 β€” rising
79 Rwanda 30.57 2019 β€” rising
81 Trinidad and Tobago 28.31 2019 β€” flat
82 Lesotho 25.6 2019 β€” flat
83 Mexico 25.05 2019 β€” flat
84 Nicaragua 23.95 2019 β€” flat
85 Saint Kitts and Nevis 23.86 2019 β€” flat
86 Lebanon 21.93 2019 β€” flat
87 Cyprus 21.65 2019 β€” volatile
88 Gabon 20.91 2019 β€” flat
89 Malawi 20.64 2019 β€” flat
90 Indonesia 14.02 2019 β€” flat
91 Zimbabwe 13.19 2019 β€” flat
92 Ethiopia 12.18 2019 β€” falling
93 Antigua and Barbuda 4.37 2019 β€” flat
94 Jordan 4.04 2019 β€” flat
95 Honduras 1.06 2019 β€” flat
96 Argentina 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Burundi 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Benin 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Burkina Faso 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Belarus 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Bolivia 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Brazil 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Barbados 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Central African Republic 0 2019 β€” flat
96 China 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Cameroon 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Congo 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Colombia 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Dominican Republic 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Algeria 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Ecuador 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Ghana 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Guinea 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Gambia 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Guinea-Bissau 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Grenada 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Guatemala 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Haiti 0 2019 β€” flat
96 India 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Italy 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Jamaica 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Kazakhstan 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Kyrgyzstan 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Cambodia 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Laos 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Sri Lanka 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Madagascar 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Maldives 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Mali 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Myanmar 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Mongolia 0 2019 β€” volatile
96 Mauritania 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Niger 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Nigeria 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Pakistan 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Panama 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Peru 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Philippines 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Paraguay 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Palestine 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Sudan 0 2019 β€” flat
96 El Salvador 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Somalia 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Suriname 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Chad 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Togo 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Tajikistan 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Tunisia 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Tanzania 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Uruguay 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Uzbekistan 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Venezuela 0 2019 β€” flat
96 Vietnam 0 2019 β€” flat

Regions and income groups

Aggregates are excluded from the country ranking above so that a region can never outrank a country.

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time to obtain VAT refund (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
156 places, 780 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to obtain VAT refund benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.