Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score was 75.58 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Papua New Guinea, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score in Papua New Guinea is 75.58, measured in 2019.
That represents a change of down 0.8% on the previous year and down 2.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score in Papua New Guinea peaked at 77.67 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 75.27, in 2014.
Papua New Guinea ranks 103rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Papua New Guinea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 75.81 | — |
| 2006 | 75.81 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 75.81 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 77.67 | +2.4% |
| 2009 | 77.67 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 77.59 | -0.1% |
| 2011 | 77.59 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 75.58 | -2.6% |
| 2013 | 75.58 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 75.27 | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 75.27 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 75.27 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 76.82 | +2.1% |
| 2018 | 76.2 | -0.8% |
| 2019 | 75.58 | -0.8% |
Papua New Guinea compared with similar countries
- Papua New Guinea's 75.58 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 72.95, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Papua New Guinea's 75.58 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 81.38, 93% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.55 | 75.81 | 77.67 | 5 |
| 2010s | 76.07 | 75.27 | 77.59 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Papua New Guinea
- 100 Honduras 76.2 compare
- 100 Saint Kitts and Nevis 76.2 compare
- 102 Croatia 75.73 compare
- 103 Tanzania 75.58 compare
- 105 South Africa 75.12 compare
- 105 South Sudan 75.12 compare
- 105 Trinidad and Tobago 75.12 compare
More reference data data for Papua New Guinea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0498 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3515 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0007 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3515 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6846 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5295 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2811 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0038 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score in Papua New Guinea?
- Paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score in Papua New Guinea was 75.58 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 77.67 in 2008.
- What is the lowest paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 75.27 in 2014.
- How does Papua New Guinea rank for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 103rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score rising or falling in Papua New Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Papua New Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.