Croatia vs Papua New Guinea: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Croatia
75.73
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
75.58
in 2019
Croatia rank
101st
Papua New Guinea rank
102nd
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Croatia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 75.73 against 75.58 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Croatia ranks 101st and Papua New Guinea ranks 102nd of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.17 | 76.55 | 0.3864 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 76.32 | 76.07 | 0.2473 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Croatia or Papua New Guinea?
- Croatia, at 75.73 against 75.58 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Croatia and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.15, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Croatia ranks 101st and Papua New Guinea ranks 102nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.