Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea

Equatorial Guinea: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 93.12 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
93.12
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
26th
of 183 countries
All-time high
93.12
in 2015
All-time low
93.12
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea, 2015–2019

0204060801002015201720192015: 93.12016: 93.12017: 93.12018: 93.12019: 93.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score in Equatorial Guinea is 93.12, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

That places Equatorial Guinea 26th out of 183 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea, year by year

Annual values for Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 93.12 —
2016 93.12 +0.0%
2017 93.12 +0.0%
2018 93.12 +0.0%
2019 93.12 +0.0%

Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries

  • Equatorial Guinea's 93.12 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 50.49, 1.8× the median. (54 countries reporting)
  • Equatorial Guinea's 93.12 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 50.88, 1.8× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea

  1. 23 Ireland 93.43 compare
  2. 24 Seychelles 93.42 compare
  3. 25 Serbia 93.23 compare
  4. 26 Eritrea 93.12 compare
  5. 28 Finland 93.09 compare
  6. 29 Portugal 92.71 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for Equatorial Guinea

All data for Equatorial Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score in Equatorial Guinea?
Paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score in Equatorial Guinea was 93.12 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 93.12 in 2015.
What is the lowest paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 93.12 in 2015.
How does Equatorial Guinea rank for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th out of 183 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-postfiling-index-0-100-db17-20-methodology-score/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-postfiling-index-0-100-db17-20-methodology-score/equatorial-guinea/">Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Equatorial Guinea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 915 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.