Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
93.12
in 2019
Serbia
93.23
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
26th
Serbia rank
25th
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 93.23 against 93.12 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.11.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th and Serbia ranks 25th of 180 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 93.23 against 93.12 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
- 0.11, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th and Serbia ranks 25th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.