How does Brazil rank for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?

Brazil ranks 54th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score rising or falling in Brazil?

Over the last ten years it is up 0.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score in Brazil

Name: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score in Brazil
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Brazil: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score was 88.98 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

88.98

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

54th

of 188 countries

All-time high

88.98

in 2013

All-time low

86.67

in 2005

Years of data

2005–2019

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score in Brazil, 2005–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in Brazil stood at 88.98. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.

That represents a change of up 0.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in Brazil peaked at 88.98 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 86.67, in 2005.

Brazil ranks 54th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	87	86.67	88.33	5
2010s	88.79	88.33	88.98	10

Countries ranked near Brazil

55 Colombia 88.33 compare
55 Costa Rica 88.33 compare
55 Denmark 88.33 compare
55 Kazakhstan 88.33 compare
55 Lithuania 88.33 compare
55 Moldova 88.33 compare
55 Slovenia 88.33 compare
55 Turkiye 88.33 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Brazil

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)

All data for Brazil →

Frequently asked questions

What is paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in Brazil?: Paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in Brazil was 88.98 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score recorded in Brazil?: The highest recorded value was 88.98 in 2013.
What is the lowest paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score recorded in Brazil?: The lowest recorded value was 86.67 in 2005.
How does Brazil rank for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?: Brazil ranks 54th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score rising or falling in Brazil?: Over the last ten years it is up 0.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Brazil data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.