Brazil vs Denmark: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score

Brazil
88.98
in 2019
Denmark
88.33
in 2019
Brazil rank
54th
Denmark rank
55th

Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score over time

  • Brazil
  • Denmark
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 88.98 against 88.33 in Denmark, a difference of 0.65.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Denmark ahead.

Brazil ranks 54th and Denmark ranks 55th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Denmark in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Denmark Difference Ahead
2000s 87 88.33 1.33 Denmark
2010s 88.79 88.33 0.455 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score, Brazil or Denmark?
Brazil, at 88.98 against 88.33 in Denmark as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score between Brazil and Denmark?
0.65, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Denmark?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Brazil and Denmark rank globally for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
Brazil ranks 54th and Denmark ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.