Palma ratio in Latvia

Latvia: Palma ratio was 1.34 in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
1.34
Change on year
up 1.6%
World rank
65th
of 120 countries
All-time high
1.75
in 2005
All-time low
0.9515
in 1993
Years of data
23
1993–2023

Palma ratio in Latvia, 1993–2023

00.511.51993200820231993: 0.9511995: 1.21996: 1.22004: 1.52005: 1.72006: 1.42007: 1.62008: 1.62009: 1.52010: 1.42011: 1.52012: 1.42013: 1.42014: 1.42015: 1.42016: 1.42017: 1.52018: 1.42019: 1.42020: 1.52021: 1.42022: 1.32023: 1.3

Source: World Bank Poverty and Inequality Platform (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data.

Analysis

Latvia recorded 1.34 for palma ratio in 2023.

The figure is up 1.6% on the previous year and down 6.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, palma ratio in Latvia peaked at 1.75 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.9515, in 1993.

Latvia ranks 65th of 120 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 23 years of available data.

Palma ratio in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Palma ratio in Latvia, 1993 to 2023.
Year Value Change
1993 0.9515
1995 1.18 +24.0%
1996 1.22 +3.2%
2004 1.52 +24.7%
2005 1.75 +15.0%
2006 1.44 -17.4%
2007 1.62 +12.6%
2008 1.59 -2.2%
2009 1.47 -7.5%
2010 1.42 -3.2%
2011 1.47 +3.7%
2012 1.42 -3.6%
2013 1.43 +1.0%
2014 1.41 -1.6%
2015 1.35 -4.2%
2016 1.35 +0.0%
2017 1.46 +8.0%
2018 1.43 -2.3%
2019 1.38 -3.3%
2020 1.48 +7.0%
2021 1.36 -7.6%
2022 1.32 -3.2%
2023 1.34 +1.6%

Latvia compared with similar countries

  • Latvia's 1.34 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.23, 1.1× the median. (42 countries reporting)
  • Latvia's 1.34 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.13, 1.2× the median. (47 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 1.12 0.9515 1.22 3
2000s 1.56 1.44 1.75 6
2010s 1.41 1.35 1.47 10
2020s 1.38 1.32 1.48 4

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 62 Switzerland 1.34 compare
  2. 63 Montenegro 1.34 compare
  3. 64 Georgia 1.34 compare
  4. 66 Germany 1.33 compare
  5. 67 Australia 1.33 compare
  6. 68 Niger 1.32 compare

See the full ranking of 120 places →

More reference data data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is palma ratio in Latvia?
Palma ratio in Latvia was 1.34 in 2023, according to World Bank Poverty and Inequality Platform (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data.
What is the highest palma ratio recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 1.75 in 2005.
What is the lowest palma ratio recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 0.9515 in 1993.
How does Latvia rank for palma ratio?
Latvia ranks 65th out of 120 countries with data for 2023.
Is palma ratio rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is down 6.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from World Bank Poverty and Inequality Platform (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as part of Palma ratio. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Palma ratio in Latvia. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank Poverty and Inequality Platform (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/palma-ratio-wb/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/palma-ratio-wb/latvia/">Palma ratio in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Palma ratio
Source
World Bank Poverty and Inequality Platform (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
120 places, 2,148 data points, 1963–2025
Last refreshed

The Palma ratio is a measure of inequality that divides the share received by the richest 10% by the share of the poorest 40%. Higher values indicate higher inequality.