Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Ecuador
Ecuador: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure was 9.1% in 2018. ▼ Falling
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Ecuador, 2009–2018
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2018, non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Ecuador stood at 9.1%. That is the lowest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is down 19.5% on the previous year and down 12.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Ecuador peaked at 13.3% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 9.1%, in 2018.
That places Ecuador 34th out of 56 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 10.4% | — |
| 2010 | 9.5% | -8.8% |
| 2011 | 13.3% | +39.8% |
| 2012 | 11.3% | -14.9% |
| 2013 | 11.5% | +1.9% |
| 2014 | 10.7% | -7.4% |
| 2015 | 12.1% | +13.2% |
| 2016 | 11.3% | -6.2% |
| 2018 | 9.1% | -19.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.4% | 10.4% | 10.4% | 1 |
| 2010s | 11.1% | 9.1% | 13.3% | 8 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Ecuador?
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Ecuador was 9.1% in 2018, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 13.3% in 2011.
- What is the lowest non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.1% in 2018.
- How does Ecuador rank for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Ecuador ranks 34th out of 56 countries with data for 2018.
- Is non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/