Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Poland
Poland: Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled was 1 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
1
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 172 countries
All-time high
1
in 1919
All-time low
0
in 1952
Years of data
99
1919–2025
Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Poland, 1919–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived).
Analysis
In 2025, multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Poland stood at 1. That is the highest value across all 99 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Poland peaked at 1 in 1919 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1952.
That places Poland 1st out of 172 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1919 | 1 | — |
| 1920 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1953 | 0 | — |
| 1954 | 0 | — |
| 1955 | 0 | — |
| 1956 | 0 | — |
| 1957 | 1 | — |
| 1958 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1962 | 0 | — |
| 1963 | 0 | — |
| 1964 | 0 | — |
| 1965 | 0 | — |
| 1966 | 0 | — |
| 1967 | 0 | — |
| 1968 | 0 | — |
| 1969 | 0 | — |
| 1970 | 0 | — |
| 1971 | 0 | — |
| 1972 | 0 | — |
| 1973 | 0 | — |
| 1974 | 0 | — |
| 1975 | 0 | — |
| 1976 | 0 | — |
| 1977 | 0 | — |
| 1978 | 0 | — |
| 1979 | 0 | — |
| 1980 | 0 | — |
| 1981 | 0 | — |
| 1982 | 0 | — |
| 1983 | 0 | — |
| 1984 | 0 | — |
| 1985 | 0 | — |
| 1986 | 0 | — |
| 1987 | 0 | — |
| 1988 | 0 | — |
| 1989 | 1 | — |
| 1990 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1 | +0.0% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 1 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1, 1.0× the median. (53 countries reporting)
- Poland's 1 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1, 1.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 1950s | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.1 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 1 Afghanistan 1 compare
- 1 Angola 1 compare
- 1 Albania 1 compare
- 1 Argentina 1 compare
- 1 Armenia 1 compare
- 1 Australia 1 compare
- 1 Austria 1 compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 1 compare
- 1 Burundi 1 compare
- 1 Belgium 1 compare
- 1 Benin 1 compare
- 1 Burkina Faso 1 compare
- 1 Bangladesh 1 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 1 compare
- 1 Bahrain 1 compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
- 1 Bolivia 1 compare
- 1 Brazil 1 compare
- 1 Barbados 1 compare
- 1 Bhutan 1 compare
- 1 Botswana 1 compare
- 1 Central African Republic 1 compare
- 1 Canada 1 compare
- 1 Switzerland 1 compare
- 1 Chile 1 compare
- 1 China 1 compare
- 1 Cote d'Ivoire 1 compare
- 1 Cameroon 1 compare
- 1 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 compare
- 1 Congo 1 compare
- 1 Colombia 1 compare
- 1 Comoros 1 compare
- 1 Cape Verde 1 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 1 compare
- 1 Cyprus 1 compare
- 1 Czechia 1 compare
- 1 Germany 1 compare
- 1 Djibouti 1 compare
- 1 Denmark 1 compare
- 1 Dominican Republic 1 compare
- 1 Algeria 1 compare
- 1 Ecuador 1 compare
- 1 Egypt 1 compare
- 1 Spain 1 compare
- 1 Estonia 1 compare
- 1 Ethiopia 1 compare
- 1 Finland 1 compare
- 1 Fiji 1 compare
- 1 France 1 compare
- 1 Gabon 1 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 1 compare
- 1 Georgia 1 compare
- 1 Ghana 1 compare
- 1 Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Gambia 1 compare
- 1 Guinea-Bissau 1 compare
- 1 Equatorial Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Greece 1 compare
- 1 Guatemala 1 compare
- 1 Guyana 1 compare
- 1 Hong Kong 1 compare
- 1 Honduras 1 compare
- 1 Croatia 1 compare
- 1 Haiti 1 compare
- 1 Hungary 1 compare
- 1 Indonesia 1 compare
- 1 India 1 compare
- 1 Ireland 1 compare
- 1 Iran 1 compare
- 1 Iraq 1 compare
- 1 Iceland 1 compare
- 1 Israel 1 compare
- 1 Italy 1 compare
- 1 Jamaica 1 compare
- 1 Jordan 1 compare
- 1 Japan 1 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 1 compare
- 1 Kenya 1 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 compare
- 1 Cambodia 1 compare
- 1 South Korea 1 compare
- 1 Kuwait 1 compare
- 1 Lebanon 1 compare
- 1 Liberia 1 compare
- 1 Libya 1 compare
- 1 Sri Lanka 1 compare
- 1 Lesotho 1 compare
- 1 Lithuania 1 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 1 compare
- 1 Latvia 1 compare
- 1 Morocco 1 compare
- 1 Moldova 1 compare
- 1 Madagascar 1 compare
- 1 Maldives 1 compare
- 1 Mexico 1 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 1 compare
- 1 Mali 1 compare
- 1 Malta 1 compare
- 1 Myanmar 1 compare
- 1 Montenegro 1 compare
- 1 Mongolia 1 compare
- 1 Mozambique 1 compare
- 1 Mauritania 1 compare
- 1 Mauritius 1 compare
- 1 Malawi 1 compare
- 1 Malaysia 1 compare
- 1 Namibia 1 compare
- 1 Niger 1 compare
- 1 Nigeria 1 compare
- 1 Nicaragua 1 compare
- 1 Netherlands 1 compare
- 1 Norway 1 compare
- 1 Nepal 1 compare
- 1 New Zealand 1 compare
- 1 Oman 1 compare
- 1 Pakistan 1 compare
- 1 Panama 1 compare
- 1 Peru 1 compare
- 1 Philippines 1 compare
- 1 Papua New Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Portugal 1 compare
- 1 Paraguay 1 compare
- 1 Romania 1 compare
- 1 Russia 1 compare
- 1 Rwanda 1 compare
- 1 Sudan 1 compare
- 1 Senegal 1 compare
- 1 Singapore 1 compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 1 compare
- 1 Sierra Leone 1 compare
- 1 El Salvador 1 compare
- 1 Serbia 1 compare
- 1 South Sudan 1 compare
- 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 compare
- 1 Suriname 1 compare
- 1 Slovakia 1 compare
- 1 Slovenia 1 compare
- 1 Sweden 1 compare
- 1 Seychelles 1 compare
- 1 Chad 1 compare
- 1 Togo 1 compare
- 1 Thailand 1 compare
- 1 Tajikistan 1 compare
- 1 Turkmenistan 1 compare
- 1 East Timor 1 compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 1 compare
- 1 Tunisia 1 compare
- 1 Turkey 1 compare
- 1 Tanzania 1 compare
- 1 Uganda 1 compare
- 1 Ukraine 1 compare
- 1 Uruguay 1 compare
- 1 United States 1 compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 1 compare
- 1 Venezuela 1 compare
- 1 Vanuatu 1 compare
- 1 Yemen 1 compare
- 1 South Africa 1 compare
- 1 Zambia 1 compare
- 1 Zimbabwe 1 compare
- 1 Taiwan 1 compare
More reference data data for Poland
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.499 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8896 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 8.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 43.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.84 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Poland?
- Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Poland was 1 in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 1919.
- What is the lowest multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1952.
- How does Poland rank for multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled?
- Poland ranks 1st out of 172 countries with data for 2025.
- Is multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 99 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Multi-party elections for legislature with 240 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Multi-party elections for legislature V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Multi-party elections for legislature with 240 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.