Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Brazil
Brazil: Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled was 1 in 2025. ▬ Flat
Latest (2025)
1
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 172 countries
All-time high
1
in 1826
All-time low
0
in 1890
Years of data
189
1826–2025
Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Brazil, 1826–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived).
Analysis
In 2025, multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Brazil stood at 1. That is the highest value across all 189 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Brazil peaked at 1 in 1826 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1890.
Brazil ranks 1st of 172 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1826 | 1 | — |
| 1827 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1891 | 0 | — |
| 1892 | 1 | — |
| 1893 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1 | +0.0% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 1 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1, 1.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 1 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1, 1.0× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1820s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 1830s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1840s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1850s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1860s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1870s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1880s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.8 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 1900s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1910s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 1 Afghanistan 1 compare
- 1 Angola 1 compare
- 1 Albania 1 compare
- 1 Argentina 1 compare
- 1 Armenia 1 compare
- 1 Australia 1 compare
- 1 Austria 1 compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 1 compare
- 1 Burundi 1 compare
- 1 Belgium 1 compare
- 1 Benin 1 compare
- 1 Burkina Faso 1 compare
- 1 Bangladesh 1 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 1 compare
- 1 Bahrain 1 compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
- 1 Bolivia 1 compare
- 1 Barbados 1 compare
- 1 Bhutan 1 compare
- 1 Botswana 1 compare
- 1 Central African Republic 1 compare
- 1 Canada 1 compare
- 1 Switzerland 1 compare
- 1 Chile 1 compare
- 1 China 1 compare
- 1 Cote d'Ivoire 1 compare
- 1 Cameroon 1 compare
- 1 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 compare
- 1 Congo 1 compare
- 1 Colombia 1 compare
- 1 Comoros 1 compare
- 1 Cape Verde 1 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 1 compare
- 1 Cyprus 1 compare
- 1 Czechia 1 compare
- 1 Germany 1 compare
- 1 Djibouti 1 compare
- 1 Denmark 1 compare
- 1 Dominican Republic 1 compare
- 1 Algeria 1 compare
- 1 Ecuador 1 compare
- 1 Egypt 1 compare
- 1 Spain 1 compare
- 1 Estonia 1 compare
- 1 Ethiopia 1 compare
- 1 Finland 1 compare
- 1 Fiji 1 compare
- 1 France 1 compare
- 1 Gabon 1 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 1 compare
- 1 Georgia 1 compare
- 1 Ghana 1 compare
- 1 Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Gambia 1 compare
- 1 Guinea-Bissau 1 compare
- 1 Equatorial Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Greece 1 compare
- 1 Guatemala 1 compare
- 1 Guyana 1 compare
- 1 Hong Kong 1 compare
- 1 Honduras 1 compare
- 1 Croatia 1 compare
- 1 Haiti 1 compare
- 1 Hungary 1 compare
- 1 Indonesia 1 compare
- 1 India 1 compare
- 1 Ireland 1 compare
- 1 Iran 1 compare
- 1 Iraq 1 compare
- 1 Iceland 1 compare
- 1 Israel 1 compare
- 1 Italy 1 compare
- 1 Jamaica 1 compare
- 1 Jordan 1 compare
- 1 Japan 1 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 1 compare
- 1 Kenya 1 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 compare
- 1 Cambodia 1 compare
- 1 South Korea 1 compare
- 1 Kuwait 1 compare
- 1 Lebanon 1 compare
- 1 Liberia 1 compare
- 1 Libya 1 compare
- 1 Sri Lanka 1 compare
- 1 Lesotho 1 compare
- 1 Lithuania 1 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 1 compare
- 1 Latvia 1 compare
- 1 Morocco 1 compare
- 1 Moldova 1 compare
- 1 Madagascar 1 compare
- 1 Maldives 1 compare
- 1 Mexico 1 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 1 compare
- 1 Mali 1 compare
- 1 Malta 1 compare
- 1 Myanmar 1 compare
- 1 Montenegro 1 compare
- 1 Mongolia 1 compare
- 1 Mozambique 1 compare
- 1 Mauritania 1 compare
- 1 Mauritius 1 compare
- 1 Malawi 1 compare
- 1 Malaysia 1 compare
- 1 Namibia 1 compare
- 1 Niger 1 compare
- 1 Nigeria 1 compare
- 1 Nicaragua 1 compare
- 1 Netherlands 1 compare
- 1 Norway 1 compare
- 1 Nepal 1 compare
- 1 New Zealand 1 compare
- 1 Oman 1 compare
- 1 Pakistan 1 compare
- 1 Panama 1 compare
- 1 Peru 1 compare
- 1 Philippines 1 compare
- 1 Papua New Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Poland 1 compare
- 1 Portugal 1 compare
- 1 Paraguay 1 compare
- 1 Romania 1 compare
- 1 Russia 1 compare
- 1 Rwanda 1 compare
- 1 Sudan 1 compare
- 1 Senegal 1 compare
- 1 Singapore 1 compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 1 compare
- 1 Sierra Leone 1 compare
- 1 El Salvador 1 compare
- 1 Serbia 1 compare
- 1 South Sudan 1 compare
- 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 compare
- 1 Suriname 1 compare
- 1 Slovakia 1 compare
- 1 Slovenia 1 compare
- 1 Sweden 1 compare
- 1 Seychelles 1 compare
- 1 Chad 1 compare
- 1 Togo 1 compare
- 1 Thailand 1 compare
- 1 Tajikistan 1 compare
- 1 Turkmenistan 1 compare
- 1 East Timor 1 compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 1 compare
- 1 Tunisia 1 compare
- 1 Turkey 1 compare
- 1 Tanzania 1 compare
- 1 Uganda 1 compare
- 1 Ukraine 1 compare
- 1 Uruguay 1 compare
- 1 United States 1 compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 1 compare
- 1 Venezuela 1 compare
- 1 Vanuatu 1 compare
- 1 Yemen 1 compare
- 1 South Africa 1 compare
- 1 Zambia 1 compare
- 1 Zimbabwe 1 compare
- 1 Taiwan 1 compare
More reference data data for Brazil
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Brazil?
- Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled in Brazil was 1 in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 1826.
- What is the lowest multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1890.
- How does Brazil rank for multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 1st out of 172 countries with data for 2025.
- Is multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Multi-party elections for legislature, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 189 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Multi-party elections for legislature with 240 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Multi-party elections for legislature V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Multi-party elections for legislature with 240 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.