Military personnel, per unit of GDP in Portugal
Portugal: Military personnel, per unit of GDP was 0 people per US$ of GDP in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Military personnel, per unit of GDP in Portugal, 1960–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in people per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Portugal recorded 0 people per US$ of GDP for military personnel, per unit of gdp in 2022. That is the lowest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.3% on the previous year and down 47.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, military personnel, per unit of gdp in Portugal peaked at 0.0001 people per US$ of GDP in 1964 and was at its lowest, 0 people per US$ of GDP, in 2022.
That places Portugal 139th out of 191 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Military personnel, per unit of GDP in Portugal, year by year
| Year | people per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 1962 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 1963 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | +70.2% |
| 1964 | 0.0001 people per US$ of GDP | +92.1% |
| 1965 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -52.1% |
| 1966 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | +8.4% |
| 1967 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 1968 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
| 1969 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -4.6% |
| 1970 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 1971 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 1972 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 1973 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -19.4% |
| 1974 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 1975 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -66.6% |
| 1976 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -24.1% |
| 1977 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1978 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1979 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 1980 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 1981 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 1982 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | +8.3% |
| 1983 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | +14.5% |
| 1984 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | +16.1% |
| 1985 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 1986 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -30.7% |
| 1987 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -16.4% |
| 1988 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 1989 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1990 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -35.6% |
| 1991 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 1992 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -22.8% |
| 1993 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 1994 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | +71.0% |
| 1995 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -46.0% |
| 1996 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 1997 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | +3.4% |
| 1998 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -6.9% |
| 1999 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 2000 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -31.9% |
| 2001 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -4.6% |
| 2002 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -9.8% |
| 2003 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -16.6% |
| 2004 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 2005 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 2006 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2007 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 2008 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 2009 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | +7.7% |
| 2010 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 2011 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 2012 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | +13.3% |
| 2013 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2014 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 2015 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2016 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 2017 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 2018 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 2019 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
| 2020 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | +4.6% |
| 2021 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 2022 | 0 people per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
Portugal compared with similar countries
- Portugal's 0 people per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 people per US$ of GDP, 1.3× the median. (64 countries reporting)
- Portugal's 0 people per US$ of GDP is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 people per US$ of GDP, 59% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Military personnel, per unit of GDP in Portugal changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1964 | +92.1% | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 people per US$ of GDP |
| 1994 | +71.0% | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP |
| 1963 | +70.2% | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP |
| 1975 | -66.6% | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 people per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 0 people per US$ of GDP | 3 |
Countries ranked near Portugal
More reference data data for Portugal
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5144 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4372 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0472 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2572 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is military personnel, per unit of gdp in Portugal?
- Military personnel, per unit of gdp in Portugal was 0 people per US$ of GDP in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest military personnel, per unit of gdp recorded in Portugal?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 people per US$ of GDP in 1964.
- What is the lowest military personnel, per unit of gdp recorded in Portugal?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 people per US$ of GDP in 2022.
- How does Portugal rank for military personnel, per unit of gdp?
- Portugal ranks 139th out of 191 countries with data for 2022.
- Is military personnel, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Portugal?
- Over the last ten years it is down 47.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Portugal data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Military personnel, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Military personnel divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Military personnel ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Military personnel Correlates of War – National Material Capabilities Version 7.0 (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Military personnel divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.