Liberal Political Institutions Index in Cuba
Cuba: Liberal Political Institutions Index was 0.146 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Liberal Political Institutions Index in Cuba, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 0.146 for liberal political institutions index in 2025.
The figure is up 4.3% on the previous year and down 2.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, liberal political institutions index in Cuba peaked at 0.647 in 1940 and was at its lowest, 0.077, in 1968.
That places Cuba 158th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Liberal Political Institutions Index in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.124 | — |
| 1790 | 0.119 | -4.0% |
| 1791 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.115 | -3.4% |
| 1845 | 0.119 | +3.5% |
| 1846 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.111 | -6.7% |
| 1869 | 0.112 | +0.9% |
| 1870 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.115 | +2.7% |
| 1880 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.123 | +7.0% |
| 1882 | 0.123 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.123 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.123 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.123 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.123 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.144 | +17.1% |
| 1888 | 0.148 | +2.8% |
| 1889 | 0.148 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.153 | +3.4% |
| 1891 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.129 | -15.7% |
| 1896 | 0.127 | -1.6% |
| 1897 | 0.127 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.236 | +85.8% |
| 1899 | 0.274 | +16.1% |
| 1900 | 0.347 | +26.6% |
| 1901 | 0.522 | +50.4% |
| 1902 | 0.534 | +2.3% |
| 1903 | 0.538 | +0.7% |
| 1904 | 0.538 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.538 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.531 | -1.3% |
| 1907 | 0.532 | +0.2% |
| 1908 | 0.532 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.532 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.536 | +0.8% |
| 1911 | 0.536 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.531 | -0.9% |
| 1913 | 0.539 | +1.5% |
| 1914 | 0.539 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.539 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.535 | -0.7% |
| 1917 | 0.535 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.535 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.535 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.525 | -1.9% |
| 1921 | 0.523 | -0.4% |
| 1922 | 0.529 | +1.1% |
| 1923 | 0.529 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.529 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.526 | -0.6% |
| 1926 | 0.525 | -0.2% |
| 1927 | 0.523 | -0.4% |
| 1928 | 0.467 | -10.7% |
| 1929 | 0.434 | -7.1% |
| 1930 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.43 | -0.9% |
| 1932 | 0.441 | +2.6% |
| 1933 | 0.435 | -1.4% |
| 1934 | 0.515 | +18.4% |
| 1935 | 0.518 | +0.6% |
| 1936 | 0.516 | -0.4% |
| 1937 | 0.516 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.516 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.516 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.647 | +25.4% |
| 1941 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.646 | -0.2% |
| 1947 | 0.646 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.646 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.647 | +0.2% |
| 1950 | 0.644 | -0.5% |
| 1951 | 0.619 | -3.9% |
| 1952 | 0.531 | -14.2% |
| 1953 | 0.335 | -36.9% |
| 1954 | 0.336 | +0.3% |
| 1955 | 0.336 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.336 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.336 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.336 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.186 | -44.6% |
| 1960 | 0.096 | -48.4% |
| 1961 | 0.09 | -6.3% |
| 1962 | 0.082 | -8.9% |
| 1963 | 0.086 | +4.9% |
| 1964 | 0.086 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.08 | -7.0% |
| 1966 | 0.08 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.08 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.077 | -3.8% |
| 1969 | 0.084 | +9.1% |
| 1970 | 0.084 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.084 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.084 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.084 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.084 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.084 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.09 | +7.1% |
| 1977 | 0.115 | +27.8% |
| 1978 | 0.115 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.12 | +4.3% |
| 1980 | 0.111 | -7.5% |
| 1981 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.112 | +0.9% |
| 1987 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.112 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.115 | +2.7% |
| 1993 | 0.113 | -1.7% |
| 1994 | 0.113 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.113 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.115 | +1.8% |
| 1997 | 0.116 | +0.9% |
| 1998 | 0.116 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.119 | +2.6% |
| 2000 | 0.119 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.124 | +4.2% |
| 2002 | 0.124 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.122 | -1.6% |
| 2004 | 0.122 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.122 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.122 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.122 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.123 | +0.8% |
| 2009 | 0.125 | +1.6% |
| 2010 | 0.126 | +0.8% |
| 2011 | 0.128 | +1.6% |
| 2012 | 0.133 | +3.9% |
| 2013 | 0.15 | +12.8% |
| 2014 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.143 | -4.7% |
| 2017 | 0.155 | +8.4% |
| 2018 | 0.159 | +2.6% |
| 2019 | 0.16 | +0.6% |
| 2020 | 0.153 | -4.4% |
| 2021 | 0.139 | -9.2% |
| 2022 | 0.141 | +1.4% |
| 2023 | 0.138 | -2.1% |
| 2024 | 0.14 | +1.4% |
| 2025 | 0.146 | +4.3% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0.146 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.6145, 24% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0.146 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.736, 20% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.124 | 0.124 | 0.124 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.119 | 0.119 | 0.119 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.119 | 0.119 | 0.119 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.119 | 0.119 | 0.119 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.119 | 0.119 | 0.119 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.119 | 0.119 | 0.119 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.1186 | 0.115 | 0.119 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.119 | 0.119 | 0.119 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.1175 | 0.111 | 0.119 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.1123 | 0.112 | 0.115 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.1293 | 0.115 | 0.148 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.1658 | 0.127 | 0.274 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.5144 | 0.347 | 0.538 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.536 | 0.531 | 0.539 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.511 | 0.434 | 0.529 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.4837 | 0.43 | 0.518 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.6467 | 0.646 | 0.647 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.3995 | 0.186 | 0.644 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.0841 | 0.077 | 0.096 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0944 | 0.084 | 0.12 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1114 | 0.111 | 0.112 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1144 | 0.112 | 0.119 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1225 | 0.119 | 0.125 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1454 | 0.126 | 0.16 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1428 | 0.138 | 0.153 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is liberal political institutions index in Cuba?
- Liberal political institutions index in Cuba was 0.146 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest liberal political institutions index recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.647 in 1940.
- What is the lowest liberal political institutions index recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.077 in 1968.
- How does Cuba rank for liberal political institutions index?
- Cuba ranks 158th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is liberal political institutions index rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Liberal Political Institutions Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent of individual and minority rights, equality before the law, and executive constraints.