Institutionalized autocracy in Mali

Mali: Institutionalized autocracy was 0 in 2011. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2011)
0
World rank
32nd
of 51 countries
All-time high
7
in 1960
All-time low
-88
in 1991
Years of data
52
1960–2011

Institutionalized autocracy in Mali, 1960–2011

-80-60-40-200196019852011

Source: Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.

Analysis

In 2011, institutionalized autocracy in Mali stood at 0.

Over the whole period, institutionalized autocracy in Mali peaked at 7 in 1960 and was at its lowest, -88, in 1991.

Mali ranks 32nd of 51 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Institutionalized autocracy in Mali, year by year

Annual values for Institutionalized autocracy in Mali, 1960 to 2011.
Year Value Change
1960 7
1961 7 +0.0%
1962 7 +0.0%
1963 7 +0.0%
1964 7 +0.0%
1965 7 +0.0%
1966 7 +0.0%
1967 7 +0.0%
1968 7 +0.0%
1969 7 +0.0%
1970 7 +0.0%
1971 7 +0.0%
1972 7 +0.0%
1973 7 +0.0%
1974 7 +0.0%
1975 7 +0.0%
1976 7 +0.0%
1977 7 +0.0%
1978 7 +0.0%
1979 7 +0.0%
1980 7 +0.0%
1981 7 +0.0%
1982 7 +0.0%
1983 7 +0.0%
1984 7 +0.0%
1985 7 +0.0%
1986 7 +0.0%
1987 7 +0.0%
1988 7 +0.0%
1989 7 +0.0%
1990 7 +0.0%
1991 -88 -1357.1%
1992 0 -100.0%
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0

Mali compared with similar countries

  • Mali's 0 is below the median for low income countries, which is 1. (20 countries reporting)
  • Mali's 0 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1. (45 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 7 7 7 10
1970s 7 7 7 10
1980s 7 7 7 10
1990s -8.1 -88 7 10
2000s 0 0 0 10
2010s 0 0 0 2

Countries ranked near Mali

  1. 32 Benin 0 compare
  2. 32 Botswana 0
  3. 32 Cape Verde 0 compare
  4. 32 Comoros 0 compare
  5. 32 Ghana 0 compare
  6. 32 Guinea 0 compare
  7. 32 Kenya 0 compare
  8. 32 Lesotho 0 compare
  9. 32 Malawi 0 compare
  10. 32 Mauritius 0
  11. 32 Mozambique 0 compare
  12. 32 Namibia 0
  13. 32 Nigeria 0 compare
  14. 32 Senegal 0 compare
  15. 32 South Africa 0 compare
  16. 32 Zambia 0 compare

See the full ranking of 51 places →

More reference data data for Mali

All data for Mali →

Frequently asked questions

What is institutionalized autocracy in Mali?
Institutionalized autocracy in Mali was 0 in 2011, according to Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.
What is the highest institutionalized autocracy recorded in Mali?
The highest recorded value was 7 in 1960.
What is the lowest institutionalized autocracy recorded in Mali?
The lowest recorded value was -88 in 1991.
How does Mali rank for institutionalized autocracy?
Mali ranks 32nd out of 51 countries with data for 2011.
Where does this Mali data come from?
The figures come from Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as part of Institutionalized autocracy. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Institutionalized autocracy in Mali. Statizoid, drawing on Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/institutionalized-autocracy/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/institutionalized-autocracy/mali/">Institutionalized autocracy in Mali</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Institutionalized autocracy
Source
Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 2,427 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed

Democracy is conceived as three essential, interdependent elements. One is the presence of institutions and procedures through which citizens can express effective preferences about alternative policies and leaders. Second is the existence of institutionalized constraints on the exercise of power by the executive. Third is the guarantee of civil liberties to all citizens in their daily lives and in acts of political participation. Other aspects of plural democracy, such as the rule of law, systems of checks and balances, freedom of the press, and so on are means to, or specific manifestations of, these general principles. We do not include coded data on civil liberties.