History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Uruguay
Uruguay: History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale was 20,186 2011 US$ in 2018. ◆ Volatile
History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Uruguay, 1800–2018
Source: Maddison Project Database (2018) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in 2011 US$.
Analysis
In 2018, history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Uruguay stood at 20,186 2011 US$. That is the highest value across all 153 years on record.
That represents a change of up 1.3% on the previous year and up 35.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Uruguay peaked at 20,186 2011 US$ in 2018 and was at its lowest, 1,838 2011 US$, in 1800.
That places Uruguay 51st out of 145 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | 2011 US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1800 | 1,838 2011 US$ | — |
| 1820 | 1,983 2011 US$ | +7.9% |
| 1850 | 2,467 2011 US$ | +24.4% |
| 1860 | 3,000 2011 US$ | +21.6% |
| 1870 | 3,677 2011 US$ | +22.6% |
| 1871 | 3,677 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 4,305 2011 US$ | +17.1% |
| 1873 | 4,403 2011 US$ | +2.3% |
| 1874 | 3,918 2011 US$ | -11.0% |
| 1875 | 3,241 2011 US$ | -17.3% |
| 1876 | 3,532 2011 US$ | +9.0% |
| 1877 | 3,435 2011 US$ | -2.7% |
| 1878 | 3,677 2011 US$ | +7.0% |
| 1879 | 3,145 2011 US$ | -14.5% |
| 1880 | 3,435 2011 US$ | +9.2% |
| 1881 | 3,096 2011 US$ | -9.9% |
| 1882 | 3,387 2011 US$ | +9.4% |
| 1883 | 3,967 2011 US$ | +17.1% |
| 1884 | 3,870 2011 US$ | -2.4% |
| 1885 | 4,355 2011 US$ | +12.5% |
| 1886 | 4,500 2011 US$ | +3.3% |
| 1887 | 3,677 2011 US$ | -18.3% |
| 1888 | 4,595 2011 US$ | +25.0% |
| 1889 | 4,112 2011 US$ | -10.5% |
| 1890 | 3,628 2011 US$ | -11.8% |
| 1891 | 3,677 2011 US$ | +1.4% |
| 1892 | 3,677 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 3,870 2011 US$ | +5.2% |
| 1894 | 4,160 2011 US$ | +7.5% |
| 1895 | 4,063 2011 US$ | -2.3% |
| 1896 | 4,112 2011 US$ | +1.2% |
| 1897 | 3,967 2011 US$ | -3.5% |
| 1898 | 3,435 2011 US$ | -13.4% |
| 1899 | 3,532 2011 US$ | +2.8% |
| 1900 | 3,387 2011 US$ | -4.1% |
| 1901 | 3,532 2011 US$ | +4.3% |
| 1902 | 4,015 2011 US$ | +13.7% |
| 1903 | 4,015 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 4,015 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 3,387 2011 US$ | -15.6% |
| 1906 | 3,822 2011 US$ | +12.8% |
| 1907 | 4,063 2011 US$ | +6.3% |
| 1908 | 4,355 2011 US$ | +7.2% |
| 1909 | 4,355 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 4,500 2011 US$ | +3.3% |
| 1911 | 4,500 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 5,176 2011 US$ | +15.0% |
| 1913 | 4,838 2011 US$ | -6.5% |
| 1914 | 3,773 2011 US$ | -22.0% |
| 1915 | 3,532 2011 US$ | -6.4% |
| 1916 | 3,435 2011 US$ | -2.7% |
| 1917 | 3,918 2011 US$ | +14.1% |
| 1918 | 3,918 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 4,595 2011 US$ | +17.3% |
| 1920 | 3,580 2011 US$ | -22.1% |
| 1921 | 3,532 2011 US$ | -1.3% |
| 1922 | 3,870 2011 US$ | +9.6% |
| 1923 | 4,112 2011 US$ | +6.3% |
| 1924 | 4,258 2011 US$ | +3.6% |
| 1925 | 4,208 2011 US$ | -1.2% |
| 1926 | 4,548 2011 US$ | +8.1% |
| 1927 | 5,080 2011 US$ | +11.7% |
| 1928 | 5,176 2011 US$ | +1.9% |
| 1929 | 5,128 2011 US$ | -0.9% |
| 1930 | 5,950 2011 US$ | +16.0% |
| 1931 | 4,838 2011 US$ | -18.7% |
| 1932 | 4,450 2011 US$ | -8.0% |
| 1933 | 4,112 2011 US$ | -7.6% |
| 1934 | 4,693 2011 US$ | +14.1% |
| 1935 | 4,790 2011 US$ | +2.1% |
| 1936 | 4,790 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 4,935 2011 US$ | +3.0% |
| 1938 | 5,273 2011 US$ | +6.8% |
| 1939 | 5,322 2011 US$ | +0.9% |
| 1940 | 4,983 2011 US$ | -6.4% |
| 1941 | 5,225 2011 US$ | +4.9% |
| 1942 | 4,838 2011 US$ | -7.4% |
| 1943 | 4,693 2011 US$ | -3.0% |
| 1944 | 5,322 2011 US$ | +13.4% |
| 1945 | 5,418 2011 US$ | +1.8% |
| 1946 | 5,903 2011 US$ | +9.0% |
| 1947 | 5,757 2011 US$ | -2.5% |
| 1948 | 5,853 2011 US$ | +1.7% |
| 1949 | 6,531 2011 US$ | +11.6% |
| 1950 | 7,015 2011 US$ | +7.4% |
| 1951 | 7,548 2011 US$ | +7.6% |
| 1952 | 7,353 2011 US$ | -2.6% |
| 1953 | 8,030 2011 US$ | +9.2% |
| 1954 | 8,273 2011 US$ | +3.0% |
| 1955 | 8,176 2011 US$ | -1.2% |
| 1956 | 8,225 2011 US$ | +0.6% |
| 1957 | 8,176 2011 US$ | -0.6% |
| 1958 | 7,788 2011 US$ | -4.7% |
| 1959 | 7,450 2011 US$ | -4.3% |
| 1960 | 7,643 2011 US$ | +2.6% |
| 1961 | 7,740 2011 US$ | +1.3% |
| 1962 | 7,498 2011 US$ | -3.1% |
| 1963 | 7,450 2011 US$ | -0.6% |
| 1964 | 7,498 2011 US$ | +0.6% |
| 1965 | 7,498 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 7,693 2011 US$ | +2.6% |
| 1967 | 7,305 2011 US$ | -5.0% |
| 1968 | 7,353 2011 US$ | +0.7% |
| 1969 | 7,740 2011 US$ | +5.3% |
| 1970 | 8,030 2011 US$ | +3.7% |
| 1971 | 7,933 2011 US$ | -1.2% |
| 1972 | 7,643 2011 US$ | -3.7% |
| 1973 | 7,885 2011 US$ | +3.2% |
| 1974 | 8,176 2011 US$ | +3.7% |
| 1975 | 8,563 2011 US$ | +4.7% |
| 1976 | 8,853 2011 US$ | +3.4% |
| 1977 | 8,950 2011 US$ | +1.1% |
| 1978 | 9,483 2011 US$ | +6.0% |
| 1979 | 9,966 2011 US$ | +5.1% |
| 1980 | 10,546 2011 US$ | +5.8% |
| 1981 | 10,643 2011 US$ | +0.9% |
| 1982 | 9,578 2011 US$ | -10.0% |
| 1983 | 8,950 2011 US$ | -6.6% |
| 1984 | 8,805 2011 US$ | -1.6% |
| 1985 | 8,901 2011 US$ | +1.1% |
| 1986 | 9,628 2011 US$ | +8.2% |
| 1987 | 10,305 2011 US$ | +7.0% |
| 1988 | 10,256 2011 US$ | -0.5% |
| 1989 | 10,305 2011 US$ | +0.5% |
| 1990 | 10,305 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 10,586 2011 US$ | +2.7% |
| 1992 | 11,350 2011 US$ | +7.2% |
| 1993 | 11,582 2011 US$ | +2.0% |
| 1994 | 12,344 2011 US$ | +6.6% |
| 1995 | 12,093 2011 US$ | -2.0% |
| 1996 | 12,660 2011 US$ | +4.7% |
| 1997 | 13,226 2011 US$ | +4.5% |
| 1998 | 13,744 2011 US$ | +3.9% |
| 1999 | 13,349 2011 US$ | -2.9% |
| 2000 | 13,050 2011 US$ | -2.2% |
| 2001 | 12,464 2011 US$ | -4.5% |
| 2002 | 11,400 2011 US$ | -8.5% |
| 2003 | 11,439 2011 US$ | +0.3% |
| 2004 | 11,955 2011 US$ | +4.5% |
| 2005 | 12,758 2011 US$ | +6.7% |
| 2006 | 13,224 2011 US$ | +3.7% |
| 2007 | 13,976 2011 US$ | +5.7% |
| 2008 | 14,870 2011 US$ | +6.4% |
| 2009 | 15,144 2011 US$ | +1.8% |
| 2010 | 16,416 2011 US$ | +8.4% |
| 2011 | 17,211 2011 US$ | +4.8% |
| 2012 | 17,876 2011 US$ | +3.9% |
| 2013 | 18,589 2011 US$ | +4.0% |
| 2014 | 19,160 2011 US$ | +3.1% |
| 2015 | 19,244 2011 US$ | +0.4% |
| 2016 | 19,468 2011 US$ | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 19,918 2011 US$ | +2.3% |
| 2018 | 20,186 2011 US$ | +1.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1800s | 1,838 2011 US$ | 1,838 2011 US$ | 1,838 2011 US$ | 1 |
| 1820s | 1,983 2011 US$ | 1,983 2011 US$ | 1,983 2011 US$ | 1 |
| 1850s | 2,467 2011 US$ | 2,467 2011 US$ | 2,467 2011 US$ | 1 |
| 1860s | 3,000 2011 US$ | 3,000 2011 US$ | 3,000 2011 US$ | 1 |
| 1870s | 3,701 2011 US$ | 3,145 2011 US$ | 4,403 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1880s | 3,899 2011 US$ | 3,096 2011 US$ | 4,595 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1890s | 3,812 2011 US$ | 3,435 2011 US$ | 4,160 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1900s | 3,895 2011 US$ | 3,387 2011 US$ | 4,355 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1910s | 4,218 2011 US$ | 3,435 2011 US$ | 5,176 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1920s | 4,349 2011 US$ | 3,532 2011 US$ | 5,176 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1930s | 4,915 2011 US$ | 4,112 2011 US$ | 5,950 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1940s | 5,452 2011 US$ | 4,693 2011 US$ | 6,531 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1950s | 7,803 2011 US$ | 7,015 2011 US$ | 8,273 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1960s | 7,542 2011 US$ | 7,305 2011 US$ | 7,740 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 8,548 2011 US$ | 7,643 2011 US$ | 9,966 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 9,792 2011 US$ | 8,805 2011 US$ | 10,643 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 12,124 2011 US$ | 10,305 2011 US$ | 13,744 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 13,028 2011 US$ | 11,400 2011 US$ | 15,144 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 18,674 2011 US$ | 16,416 2011 US$ | 20,186 2011 US$ | 9 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
More reference data data for Uruguay
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2999 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3685 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2195 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 33.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.01 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Uruguay?
- History’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Uruguay was 20,186 2011 US$ in 2018, according to Maddison Project Database (2018) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 20,186 2011 US$ in 2018.
- What is the lowest history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 1,838 2011 US$ in 1800.
- How does Uruguay rank for history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale?
- Uruguay ranks 51st out of 145 countries with data for 2018.
- Is history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is up 35.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Maddison Project Database (2018) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 153 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Unit 1 'The capitalist revolution’ Section 1.3 'History's Hockey Stick: Growth in income' in The CORE Team, The Economy. Available at: https://tinyco.re/28126370 [Figure 1.1b]