Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Czechia
Czechia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Czechia, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Czechia stood at 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. That is the highest value across all 27 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 9.3% on the previous year and up 23.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Czechia peaked at 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025 and was at its lowest, 0.5081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
That places Czechia 27th out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Czechia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.6178 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.5226 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.4% |
| 2000 | 0.5081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.8% |
| 2002 | 0.8294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +63.2% |
| 2003 | 0.7649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.8% |
| 2004 | 0.7031 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.1% |
| 2005 | 0.9029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.4% |
| 2006 | 0.7585 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.0% |
| 2007 | 0.5893 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.3% |
| 2008 | 0.89 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +51.0% |
| 2009 | 0.9208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.5% |
| 2010 | 0.7929 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.9% |
| 2011 | 0.8153 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.8% |
| 2012 | 0.8045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.3% |
| 2013 | 0.7767 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.4% |
| 2014 | 0.9801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +26.2% |
| 2015 | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.4% |
| 2016 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.0% |
| 2017 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2018 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2019 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.9% |
| 2020 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
| 2021 | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.8% |
| 2022 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.9% |
| 2023 | 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.4% |
| 2024 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.7% |
| 2025 | 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.3% |
Czechia compared with similar countries
- Czechia's 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (74 countries reporting)
- Czechia's 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.8309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.5× the median. (54 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Czechia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | +63.2% | 0.5081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5702 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5226 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6178 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.763 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.9412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7767 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Czechia
More reference data data for Czechia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5039 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1071 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5681 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.81 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Czechia?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Czechia was 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Czechia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Czechia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Czechia rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Czechia ranks 27th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Czechia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 23.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Czechia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.