Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Botswana
Botswana: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Botswana, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Botswana recorded 0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for government effectiveness - governance estimate in 2025.
That represents a change of down 15.7% on the previous year and down 34.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Botswana peaked at 0.6654 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.1689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
That places Botswana 69th out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Botswana, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.1748 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.1693 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.2% |
| 2000 | 0.1689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2002 | 0.4084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +141.7% |
| 2003 | 0.5954 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +45.8% |
| 2004 | 0.4961 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.7% |
| 2005 | 0.5729 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.5% |
| 2006 | 0.3629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -36.7% |
| 2007 | 0.5423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +49.4% |
| 2008 | 0.6295 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.1% |
| 2009 | 0.6612 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.0% |
| 2010 | 0.6101 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.7% |
| 2011 | 0.6186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2012 | 0.6043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.3% |
| 2013 | 0.6172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.1% |
| 2014 | 0.6189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2015 | 0.6654 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.5% |
| 2016 | 0.6285 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.5% |
| 2017 | 0.5164 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.8% |
| 2018 | 0.4448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.9% |
| 2019 | 0.5016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.8% |
| 2020 | 0.3907 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.1% |
| 2021 | 0.4364 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.7% |
| 2022 | 0.4582 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.0% |
| 2023 | 0.5542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.9% |
| 2024 | 0.5149 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.1% |
| 2025 | 0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.7% |
Botswana compared with similar countries
- Botswana's 0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Botswana's 0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Botswana changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | +141.7% | 0.1689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1721 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1693 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1748 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.4931 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6612 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.5826 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6654 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4648 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3907 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
More reference data data for Botswana
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0472 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0078 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0825 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.97 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0424 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Botswana?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Botswana was 0.4343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6654 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2015.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Botswana rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Botswana ranks 69th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Botswana?
- Over the last ten years it is down 34.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.